•  

    invention

    If you have seriously researched the question of Palestine for any amount of time, then

     

    it is safe to say that you have come across your fair share of wild and unsubstantiated

     

    claims and arguments from advocates of Israel. Perhaps one of the more consistently

     

    asserted ones is the claim that the name Palestine originated with the Romans, and

     

    came into existence as a punishment by the Romans against the Jewish people.

    It is quite interesting how selective people can be when they read history. They often

     

    learn just enough to support their world view, separating it completely from any

     

    historical context or the larger picture of the region. I do not know where this talking

     

    point comes from, or who popularized it, but it is simply incorrect, and frankly quite

     

    comical in how lazy it is. Without exaggeration, this talking point could be debunked

     

    with a 10 second search, that’s how easily disproven it is. However, even the crudest

     

    of propaganda can be useful as a teaching tool. Keep in mind, of course, that when

     

    it comes to history there is a wealth of details and nuances involved which keep it from

     

    being a simplistic black and white affair, that’s why ethno-nationalists with their dualistic

     

    worldviews tend to have terrible historical literacy.

    The very first traces of the name Palestine come from the time of Ramses II and III,

     

    roughly around the mid-12th century BC. There is an inscription dated to around 1150 BC at

     

    the Medinet Habu temple in Luxor which refers to the Peleset (PLST) among those who

     

    fought against Ramses III. Today we know the Peleset as the Philistines.

    Interestingly enough, it was long thought that the Philistines were sea-faring marauders,

     

    possibly Aegean in origin who invaded the Levant. This would neatly tie them into the

     

    Biblical narrative. However, there has been mounting evidence to suggest that the Philistines

     

    were actually an indigenous population originating in the region. According to advocates

     

    of this relatively new approach to the origins of the Philistines, the evidence has always

     

    been there, but in their haste to match archaeological evidence to the Biblical narrative

     

    many historians and archaeologists overlooked certain inconsistencies and contradictory

     

    evidence. You will find that much of the history of Palestine falls into this same trap, and

     

    many of the myths regarding Palestine today emanate from trying to force a Biblical

     

    narrative onto history with little -if any- corroborating evidence.

    Regardless of their origins, their name came to be associated with the area, not only in

     

    ancient Egyptian inscriptions, but also in ancient Assyrian inscriptions. For example,

     

    various Assyrian inscriptions from the 8th and 7th century BC refer to the area as “Palashtu”.

     

    This is the result of the Philistines’ influence and their intermingling and integration with the

     

    various peoples inhabiting the Levant. Prior to this, the area was more commonly known as

     

    Djahi, Retenu or Canaan, but beginning from the late Bronze age onwards, and as a result of said Philistine influence, the term Palashtu or Palestine came to replace them.

    According to Nur Masalha, their influence can still be felt today:

    “..almost all the toponyms of the cities of Philistia: Gaza (Ghazzah), Askelon (‘Asqalan),

     

    Ashdod (Isdud), Tantur (Tantura), Gath (Jat), Ekron (‘Aqir) survived into the modern era a

     

    nd were preserved in the modern Palestinian Arabic names and were mostly depopulated

     

    by Israel in 1948.

    It was during Classical Antiquity and the Hellenistic period (~500-135 BC) that the name

     

    “Palestine” as we know it today took form. The use of the terms Palaistine or Phalastin were widespread in the literature of the period. Philosophers and scientists such as Ptolemy and Aristotle spoke of Palaistine, and Herodotus’ Histories commonly

     

    used the name Palestine.

    In these writings, the use of the name Palaistine did not refer solely to the areas ruled

     

    by the Philistines at one point or another, but to wider swaths of the region, in some cases

     

    even stretching as far as what we would today call Jordan.

    There are many more examples of the usage of the term or its cognates, and it is not

     

    the intention of this article to delve too deeply into the history of these uses. However, if you

     

    find the history of the name interesting then the further reading section has some r

     

    ecommendations that you might find to your liking. Regardless, it is quite clear that this

     

    name originated well before the Romans or their conquest of Palestine.

    As with all propaganda, conveying historical or factual accuracy is not the intended goal. These

     

    claims serve mainly to demonize Palestinians and frame them as usurpers to the land, and

     

    attempt to tie them to the Roman persecution of the Jewish people. This is purely ideologically

     

    motivated with no basis in reality or history, and its widespread use speaks to the prevalence of blind regurgitation of talking points in Zionist circles without any kind of evidence or historical knowledge.

    But think about this for a moment: If such a basic falsity which could be debunked with a 10

     

    second search is so widespread and internalized among defenders of Israel, can you imagine

     

    all the other, more complicated falsities that form the basis of their talking points?

    Sadly, this animates much of the mainstream debate on Palestine, and Palestinians must

     

    constantly and consistently re-litigate false claims they had debunked decades ago to no avail. It

     

    is my hope that one day we will not have to fight these battles anymore, and the region can

     

    recover its hijacked history.