Sunday, January 30, 2022

Mark Davis. Idiot.

Mark Davis is the owner of The Las Vegas Raiders and he is to professional football what Billy Barty was to height.


In searching for a new Head Coach for his team, Mr. Davis could have settled on Jim Harbaugh who won twice as many games as he lost as head coach of the San Francisco 49ers. Harbaugh is a proven winner who owns one of the best winning percentages of any coach in NFL History.


He was the head coach of the San Francisco 49ers from 2011 until the 2014 season, during which time the 49ers went 44-19-1.


Instead, he is apparently going to hire Josh McDaniel, the offensive coordinator of the New England Patriots who had a losing record when he was the Head Coach of the Denver Broncos.


McDaniels record was 11-17 at Denver before he was fired.


How difficult is it to choose between the two Head Coaches? 


Mr. Davis could have hired an experienced Head Coach who won twice as many games as he lost or he could hire as Head Coach a man who won less than 40 % of his games in Denver.


I expected all along he'd make the stupid decision to hire McDaniels because Mr. Davis has always been running on empty hope divorced from reality.


It is why he hired Jon Gruden to be Head Coach of the Raiders after Gruden had been a fired as Tampa Bay Head Coach after years of sub-mediocrity and ghastly draft picks and after he had been out of coaching, working as an NFL commentator,  for a decade.


Mr. Davis hired him for 100 million dollars on a ten year deal - a completely unheard of and unjustified contract - and Gruden, a franchise killer, ran the team into the ground and was fired because some NFL official leaked his private emails.


To the average fan it is crystal clear that Ed Dodds, assistant to General Manager Chris Ballard of the Indianapolis Colts ( a team loaded with talent)  is the correct hire as The Raiders GM but Mr. Davis, who specialises in idiocy and inanity, did not hire him after interviewing him for the position.


No, it appears that Mr. Davis, whose haircut is an indication of his mental acuity and judgement, has settled on Josh McDaniel as Head Coach and some Patriots factotum named Ziegler as GM.


It is clear that McDaniels will be a failure but laugh all the way to the bank while Mr. Davis, running on empty hope, will actualise his magical thinking that simply by hiring a coach from a successful franchise will result in the Las Vegas Raiders becoming like that franchise.


That was the same "thinking" behind the Jon Gruden hire - that he would magically restore the Raiders greatness.


OK, Raider Fan, here comes more of your team's massive failure because stupid decisions are  not even a speed bump to Mark Davis, the son of  Lord Al Davis, who inherited the team after Lord Al went to that Eternal Flame in the stadium- a man who does not know the difference between football and foot powder.




Friday, January 28, 2022

Buy this book if you are interested in American liberty

Readers wil have to scroll down to read the scans from Crashmaker, a novel that substitutes for the expensive travesty and lies of the public schools and colleges in America



















Thursday, January 27, 2022

Traditional (Raccolta # 624) prayer for unity

Almighty and everlasting God, whose will it is that all men should be saved and that one should perish, look upon the souls that are deceived by the guile of Satan, in order that the hearts of them that have gone astray may put aside all the perverseness of heresy, and being truly repentant, may return to the unity of They truth. Through Christ our Lord. Amen. (Roman Missal) 

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

Sunday, January 23, 2022

First Class Error in Fourth Cup Thesis

 

First Class Error in Fourth Cup Thesis





                           Mick Amongst The Hahn-verts

And it came to pass that I was among the adoring crowds anxious 
to hear the good news from the fifth evangelist before whom all of Tradition must genuflect. 

I was amongst tens of hundreds of adoring acolytes crowded into
Saint Therese de Lisieux Catholic Church in Wellington, Florida on August 31, as the chosen one addressed the multitudes from 9:00 am until 2:12 pm.

I had paid my $26.00 with the solitary goal of publicly challenging the chosen one over his claims about Holy Maundy Thursday, the Last Supper/First Mass, and the putative “Fourth Cup,” which, according to the authoritative CPA (Convert from Protestantism Apologist), is the
key to understanding the Bible and its Eucharist 
Institution accounts.

Dr. Hahn is as wrong about that novel claim as he is popular and 
deemed authoritative by his uncountable Hahn-Verts – especially those Bishops and Priests who have been converted to his radical exegetical evangelical claims which appear to have some connection to his Presbyterian Seminary (Gordon-Conwell) training in Theonomy (An ideology advocating the application of Mosaic Laws to the society
 the Christian finds his own self living in).


Those Bishops and Priests have stood in his presence, apparently in 
full agreement, as the great communicator casts his eisegetical spell 
over his adoring acolytes and presents a new Gospel based upon, 
wait'll until ya get a load of this later on, a first century Seder Meal.

But, I first have to note just how effective a speaker Dr. Hahn is; from 
his bearing to his enthusiasm to his materials to his entire presentation which mixes intelligence, learning, humor, and even pathos, he had his acolytes eating out of the palms of his hands and nodding their heads in agreement to all of his statements in such fervent unison that they reminded me of the flocks of pigeons in Piazza San Marco in 
Venice racing after popcorn pitched by tourists.

There can be no doubt that had Dr. Hahn proclaimed - Sam the Sham 
was the last in a long line of great Egyptian Pharoahs that the painting of The Stations of the Cross would have vibrated due to the force of the sound generated by  AMENS !!

However, Dr. Hahn made some excellent points, among them the valuable reminder  that the words, “New Testament” are the only such words in the new testament and those are said by Jesus which reminds us all that the New Testamnet is not so much about a book or collection of books but about the action of Christ, the Mass (my paraphrase).

He also made a neat summary of the New Evangelisation by describing it as your story about your Catholic Faith shared with others (paraphrase) after crediting Pope Blessed John Paul II with having had the keen, and right, insight that it was the Baptised who need evangelising – an undeniable truth.

He was also charmingly self-effacive at points - I'm not much but I am 
all that I think  about - and he told genuinely interesting personal vingnetttes that did not cast him in the best of lights and he was, 
frankly, simply brilliant at presenting the scriptural basis for Confession and illustrating the necessity for it by linking  New Testament citations
 with Genesis and the Creation of Adam and Original Sin and dying the death as referring to the loss of Sanctifying Grace and from his own life he supplied the matter that grounded his theological points in here-and-now reality.

Well done, sir; very well done!!!

But – at this is a but bigger than Oprah's – it was his presentation of 
“The Fourth Cup.” (the putative Ritualistic Map discovered by Dr. 
Hahn that helped him to escape the querulous quandary in which he then spiritually existed) that constituted both the major part of his anti-Traditional eisegesis and the dangerous error that he has been
 successfully spreading with as much success as did Johnny Appleseed accomplish his self-appointed task.


It is worth noting that the presentation I was at contained not a single word of caution from Dr. Hahn that this was merely his own opinion and an opinion not shared my others – you know, such as Doctors of The Catholic Church and The Early Church Fathers and can not be found in any reliable Catholic Commentary (A Lapide, Catena 
Aurea, Haydock's Commentary, and even Dom Orchard's 1952 Commentary is in opposition to Hahn) , nor is it even hinted at in such sources as Denzinger, Ott, Premm, Spirago-Clarke, Radio Replies, Catholic Evidence Training Outlines (yes, Dr. Hahn 
wrote the Forward to the 1992 reprint) Liturgical Year etc etc etc

Dr. Hahn's Ritualistic Map that is supposed to lead the believer from naïveté and/or theological confusion to the heart of the matter of The Institution of the Holy Eucharist - that it is a First Century Seder that Jesus supposedly faithfully followed.

No, I am not kidding.

This is the very center – the hearth and heart – of his captious claim 
(for me, not the Hahn-Verts) that at the Last Supper/First Mass, Jesus and His Apostles celebrated a Seder.

Bullshit.

The Seder (Order) Meal was developed by Rabbinical Judiasm after 
Titus had  destroyed the City of Deicide as this Jewish author confesses:

Almost everyone doing serious work on the early history of Passover traditions, including Joseph Tabory, Israel Yuval, Lawrence Hoffman, and the father-son team of Shmuel and Ze’ev Safrai, has rejected Finkelstein’s claims for the great antiquity of  the bulk of the Passover Haggadah. What is particularly significant about this consensus is that these scholars are not radical skeptics. These scholars believe that, 
generally speaking, we can extract historically reliable information from rabbinic sources. But as demonstrated by the late Baruch Bokser in his book The Origins of the Seder, practically everything preserved in the early rabbinic traditions concerning the Passover Seder brings us back to the time immediately following the
 Roman destruction of the Temple in 70 C.E. (A.D. 70 for those who accept Jesus as Messias). It’s not that rabbinic literature 
cannot be trusted to tell us about history in the first century of the Common Era. It’s  that rabbinic literature—in the case of the Seder—does not even claim to be telling  us how the Seder was performed before the destruction of the Temple.


Further background



So why does Dr. Hahn insist that Jesus and His Apostles celebrated a Seder and why is he so fixiated on “The Fourth Cup” when those matters have never been a concern for Catholics?

Who knows ? It is prolly just the flowering of some malign theonomic seed planted in him during his seminary days.

What we do know from Catholic Tradition is that Jesus did not just 
lead His Apostles in the celebration of just a Jewish Meal – Seder or regular meal – but a passover meal FOLLOWED by the Insititution of the Eucharistic Sacrificial Meal (to stay with the meal analogy for the moment).

He did both even though Dr. Hahn is ignorant of this (I don't know how he could be if he read Trent; He does have a personal library of 20,000 or more books) or if that  is the case, then he simply prefers his own theological ideology which in the matter of his "Fourth Cup" presentations (delivered 100s of times) is not Traditional 
Catholic exegesis but Protestant eisegesis.

It is simply preposterous to insist that Jesus faithfully followed a seder that was not even developed until long after His Passion, Death, and Resurrection.

Here is the gteat commentary of Cornelius a Lapide that explains and settles the matter:

Council of Trent (Sess. 22, c. 1): “After Christ had celebrated the ancient Passover, which the multitude of the sons of Israel sacrificed in memory of their going out of Egypt, He instituted a new Passover, that He Himself should be immolated by the Church (ab ecclesia), by means of (per) the priests, under (sub) visible signs, in  memory of His passage from this world to the Father, when He redeemed us by the shedding of His Blood, and delivered us from the power of darkness, and translated
 us to His Kingdom.


In the ever new light of Catholic Tradition I  began to understand why 
the  scripture expert continually used his own words rather than the words of Jesus when it came to the putative Fourth Cup for Dr. Hahn does not quote Jesus accurately but rather, repeatedly, claims that in Matt 26:29, Jesus says “He will not drink...until His kingdom is revealed” rather than 

And I say to you, I will not drink from henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I shall drink it with you new in the kingdom of my Father

and for Dr. Hahn that kingdom is revealed when Jesus drinks the wine/vinegar on the Cross which is supposed to be The Fourth Cup of the Seder.

Dr. Hahn's presumptively christian exegesis is rather a Judaised 
eisegesis based upon a Seder Meal developed by Rabbis long after Jesus instituted the Eucharist in the Upper Room and he has spread these Judaised seeds all over America in presumptively
 Catholic Churches and I am unaware of any Bishop or Priest who has called him on this and corrected him.

I never did get to ask his question because there was no Q & A session but during one break I got Dr. Hahn alone for a quick eye-balling 
during which time I noted I had a question about the presentation and Dr. Hahn walked off saying “I'll be right back.”

He did not return. C'est la vie. Maybe he was alerted to potential problems because I had a Bible and a zippered notecase that might have contained some contrary information  or maybe it was simply the case (more likely) that he was just too busy and forgot to return.

What is undeniable is that Saint Therese de Lesieux may as well be renamed Saint Scott for it has been completely Hahn-verted which is another way of saying its Catholic Tradition has been subverted and inverted and it has been Baptised into the Presbyterian Theonomic Ideology personified by Dr. Hahn.

I inquired about signing-up for two Bible Study Courses but both courses required that I buy his textbooks and Dr. Hahn's text on Exodus alone cost $50.00.

He was also selling his books on Sacramentals, his Catholic Dictionary, his Biblical Exegetical Series, and he was giving away copies of his weekly reflections of the weekly scriptural readings of the Lil' Licit Liturgy. 

It is quite clear that today's Catholic need never again consult 
The Early Church Fathers (Hahn has his own book of specially-culled excerpts from them) and because he made it clear that anybody who
 tells you that Vatican Two was a rupture ought not be listened to 
(that did make me smile) and that Vatican Two was  a great blessing 
and it came at just the right time, I came to understand that I 
was witnessing an astonishing Ecumenical Conciliar disaster 
being recast as an Ob-La-Di, Ob-La-Da Dadaism Song and Dance of Denial.

When I told the Bible Study sign-up clerk that I had my own Bibles 
and Catholic Commentaries she said that made no difference for Saint Therese de Lesieux would exclusively be using Dr. Hahn's material 
from now on and that I could not take the courses unless I purchased 
Dr. Hahn's material.

Seems reasonable given that he has supplanted Catholic Tradition.

I have to give credit where it is due and Dr. Hahn has to be credited 
with being a marketing genius if nothing else but I also wonder just when some Priest will publicly stand-up to some of his captious claims and refute them with Tradition.

Prolly never as AmChurch Clergy are far more like to have been in a Seminary where they have engaged in trust exercises (falling backwards into each others arms) rather than being exposed to and taught Catholic Tradition.

C'est la vie.

In hs fascinating and revealing, Nikitaroncalli, Franco Bellgrandi, 
Court Chamberlaim of the Sword and Cape of His Holiness in the Papal Court , described the devolution of Catholicism and its rejection of Tradition as the process of  The Body of Christ phagocytizing protestantism – and I saw it in action.

Friday, January 21, 2022

Hell

 Eternal punishment and destiny

of the reprobate 



Ibunt hi in supplicium aeternum. 
And these shall go into everlasting 
punishment. (Matthew 25:46) 

There is one terrible truth in Christianity which in 
our times, even more than in previous centuries, arouses 
irrepressible horror in the heart of man. That truth is 
the eternity of the pains of Hell. No sooner is this 
dogma stated than minds become agitated, hearts shake and 
pound, passions harden and rage against this doctrine and 
the unwelcome voices which proclaim it. Ought we, then, 
to be silent, leaving shrouded in oblivion an essential 
truth about man's most important concern: his final des- 
tiny beyond the short years of his exile on earth? Yet, 
if Hell is a reality, whatever silence we might maintain 
over this fundamental question would not shake its cer- 
tainty. All the attenuations and palliatives of human 
language cannot shorten its duration. It would be the 
height of folly to convince ourselves that if we turn our 
minds away from this fatal possibility and try hard not to 
believe in it we shall manage some day to avoid its rigour. 

In this series of conferences, wherein we propose to 
deal with the things relating to the future of man and his 
immortal destiny, we could not leave out the punishments 
of the life to come without failing in our duty and acting 
like a false, negligent doctor who, for the sake of spar- 
ing his patient the suffering of an operation, calmly left 
him to die. On this subject, Christ Himself did not think 
it fit to speak with circumspection and reserve. He 
continually emphasizes the punishments reserved for sin- 
ners, and, on many occasions, speaks about exterior dark- 
ness, the fire which is not extinguished, and the prison 
without an exit, where there will be gnashing of teeth and 
unending tears. 

When human justice wishes to strike down an evil man, 
a scaffold is erected in the public square and the people 
"are summoned to be present at the terrible spectacle. In 
some lands, the broken body of the miscreant is left for 
days on end hanging by the road or upon the gibbet 
where he breathed his last in order that such an example 
may frighten wrongdoers who might be led astray by wicked 
passions. ~ Jesus Christ acts in the same way as human 
justice: He shows the malefactor the sword which hangs 
over his head, so that, being stricken with fear, he may 
not contravene His law, and may do good instead of evil. 

St. Ignatius of Loyola used to say that he knew of no 
sermons more useful and beneficial than those on Hell. 
Reflections on the beauties of virtue and the delights and 
attractions of divine love have little influence upon 
coarse, sensual men. Amidst the noisy pleasures of their 
lives, the seductive bad examples set before them, the 
traps and pitfalls set beneath their feet, the threat of 
Hell is the only curb powerful enough to keep them on the 
path of duty. For the same reason St. Teresa would often 
bid her austere nuns down to Hell in spirit and 
thought during their life, so as to avoid, she said, going 
there in reality after their death. 

In the study which we are about to undertake on this 
serious question of the fate reserved for those who die at 
enmity with God, we shall avoid all disputed opinions, 
proceeding by rigorous reasoning and with the aid of sound 
theology, taking as our sole basis Scripture and the true 
knowledge of tradition and of the Fathers. In the first 
place, does Hell exist, and is it certain that the punish- 
ments endured there are eternal? Secondly, of what nature 
is the punishment of Hell, and where does it take place? 
Thirdly, can the mercy of God be reconciled with the idea 
of a justice which no reparation can ever appease? 

No man can undertake the study of these supreme 
considerations without hearing the echo of these words of 
Scripture resounding in his innermost soul: "Be watchful, 
serve the Lord thy God and keep his commandments; for in 
this is the whole of man." He who reflects upon these 
awesome truths is certain to improve; he will at once feel 
his spirit transformed, and his nature enhanced in strength 
of virtue and love of good. 



That the punishments of Hell are eternal is a truth 
formally taught by Holy Scripture; it is part of the 
Christian creed; numerous councils have defined it as an 
article of faith. [231] St. Matthew, in chapter 18, and 
St. John, in chapter 14 of the Apocalypse, speaking about 
the pains of the demons and reprobate, say that they will 
be of endless duration. [232] St. Mark, chapter 9, and 
Isaias, chapter 66, say that their fire will not be ex- 
tinguished, and their worm will not die. Quoting these 
words St. Augustine remarks that the nature of this worm 
and the materiality or immateriality of the fire is open 
to discussion; but what is true beyond all dispute from 
the words of the prophet is that the rigours of this fire 
will never be moderated, and that the tortures of this 
worm will never diminish. 

When Jesus Christ speaks about the supreme sentence 
which He will pronounce one day, He retains and confirms 
the same parity between justification and condemnation; 
neither in the rewards of the just nor in the punishment 
of the wicked does He make any distinction of degree or 
time: "And these shall go into everlasting punishment, but 
the just into life everlasting ."Thus, if eternal 
life can have no limit of time, eternal death, too, will 
be without limit or end. 

From these various testimonies, we know that mercy is 
excluded from Hell, and that there can be no place there 
for redemption. 

Moreover, there are only three ways whereby the reprobate 
and the demons could be released from justice and obtain 
freedom or mitigation of their pains: by -a true and sin- 
cere repentance; or by the power of the prayers of the 
saints and the works of satisfaction offered up by the 
living; or else by the destruction of their existence - in 
other words, as it is absolutely impossible for God to take 
them to Himself, He would, by making them cease to exist, 
thereby bring their torments to an end. Now, the repro- 
bate cannot do penance. God has never granted pardon to 
Satan because Satan has never repented . Sometimes, says 
St. Thomas, a person repents and hates sin in one or two 
ways: absolutely or accidentally. He who hates sin abso - 
lutely , hates it on account of its intrinsic ugliness, and 
because it is an offence against God; he who hates it 
acc identally , hates it, not out of love of God, but out of 
love of himself: in other words, he does not really detest 
sin, but only the pain, the evils which it has brought 
him. The will of the damned is still inclined to evil, 
and their horror and detestation of their punishment is 
neither repentance nor atonement. Undoubtedly they 
are consumed by desires and dreams; but the object of 
these dreams is their own happiness, which they would 
arrange independently of God. 

Such is the dream of the demons and the damned, a 
dream eternally futile which consumes them in unceasing 
despair and rage. So, the damned cannot repent. Can they 
share in the prayers and merits of the living? If this 
were so, Lucifer and his angels would be able, in the more 
or less distant future, to return to favour; consequently 
they would become holy creatures, worthy of reverence and 
love, by the same right as the. cherubim and the arch- 
angels, whom they would one day embrace in an eternal 
"communion. It would follow, too, that the Church would be 
obliged to pray for the demons. The demons are, in truth, 
our worst enemies, but the precept of charity requires us 
to pray for all our enemies without exception. The Church 
prays for the persecutors in this world because, during 
the present life, they can produce worthy fruits of repent- 
ance; but even on the day of Judgement, when she will be 
filled with love and holiness, she will not pray for those 
sentenced by the just Judge to everlasting torments. If 
the reprobate can expect to be saved one day, not only 
must the Church pray for them but, in addition, we do not 
see why she would forbid the faithful to venerate them and 
why she would not gather up the remains of the Neros, 
Robespierres and Marats, to honour them on the altar, by 
the same right as the ashes of the Aloysius Gonzagas, 
Vincent de Pauls and Francis de Sales. 

In short, it is evident that the sufferings of the 
reprobate will have no end and that their existence wxll 
never be destroyed. Holy Scripture depicts their pitiful 
state by calling it "secunda mors", a "second death . St. 
Gregory says: "It will be a death that will never be 
consummated, an end always followed by a new beginning, a 
dissolution that will never bring decay. St. August- 
ine expresses with no less vigour and clarity the sad 
condition of that death which, while letting the soul sub- 
sist eternally, will make it endure its pangs and horrors 
in all their intensity: "It cannot be said that there 
will be the life of the soul in Hell, since the soul will 
not share in any way in the supernatural life of God; it 
cannot be said that there will be the life of the body, 
since the body will there be a prey to all kinds of pains. 
Hence, this second death will be more cruel than the first 
because death can never bring it to an end. 

To these theological proofs, let us add the proofs 
from reason. 

If there were not an eternal Hell, Christianity would 
disappear and the moral order would be abolished. 

This truth about the eternity of punishment is linked 
essentially to the great truths of religion - to the Fall 
of man, the Incarnation and Redemption - which logically 
imply its certainty. If there were no Hell, why would 
Jesus Christ have descended from Heaven, why His abasement 
in the crib, His ignominies, sufferings and sacrifice on 
the Cross? This excess of love on the part of a God Who 
became man in order to die would have been an act devoid 
of any wisdom, and out of proportion with its declared 
aim, if it had been simply a matter of delivering us from 
a temporal, transient punishment, such as is Purgatory. 
Man, then, had fallen irremediably upon evil days, and was 
condemned to infinite disgrace, since only a divine remedy 
could raise him up again. 


Otherwise we should have to say that Christ redeemed 
us only from a finite punishment, from which we might have 
freed ourselves by our own amends; and, in that case, 
would not the treasures of His blood be superfluous? 
There would no longer be any redemption in the strict and 
absolute sense of the word: Jesus Christ would not be our 
Saviour; the debt of boundless gratitude and love which He 
demands of men would be an inordinate and unwarranted 
claim. With the God made man cast down from the throne of 
our hearts and our worship, Christianity would become a 
hoax, and all consistent minds would necessarily be led to 
reject revelation and to reject God Himself. 

If there is no eternal Hell, there is no moral order. 

The foundation of the moral order is the absolute and 
essential difference between good and evil. Good and evil 
are different in essence, because their conclusions are 
different and they result in opposite outcomes; but, if we 
abolish the eternal sanction of punishment, vice and 
virtue reach the same conclusion. Each, by different 
means, attains its last end, which is repose and happiness 
in the bliss of God. The same fate falls to the share of 
those who have been instruments of evil and to those who, 
right up to the end, have been incorruptible vessels of 
good. 

You may say: "Agreed, but it will be a thousand or a 
hundred thousand years sooner for the just; a thousand or 
a hundred thousand years later for the wicked." What does 
that matter? A period of atonement, however long you 
suppose it to be, does not constitute an essential differ- 
ence between the destiny of the one and that of the other. 
During our fleeting, transient life, when moments, once 
passed, never recur, a period of a thousand or a hundred 
thousand years is of some consequence; but, as soon as man 
has entered into eternal life, a thousand or a hundred 
thousand years no longer have any significance: they are 
less than a grain of sand in the desert, or a drop of 
water in the ocean. Imagine a future composed of punish- 
ments, as long as you wish, double the years, pile cent- 
uries upon centuries - so long as the end is the same for 
all, the past counts for nothing. Once a punishment is 
over, the extent of its duration, compared with eternity, 
will seem such a tiny quantity, so infinitesimal, that it 
will be as if it did not exist. 

It would in fact be true to say - since there is no 
perceptible difference between one eternity and another - 
that sin would have brought no harm upon the sinner. For 
example, let us suppose that, as punishment for my sins, 
God hurls me into the flames for centuries. I have this 
consolation: I know that I have for myself a measure of 
comparison, mathematically equal to that of the just man. 
I have eternity; so there is an eternity of joy and glory 
for one who has served God and loved Him until death, and 
an eternity of joy and glory for the wicked man who 
thrilled with pleasure as he did evil, and constantly 
spurned the divine laws and commandments. Now, if these 
two final ends are the same, if, by way of evil even, as by 
way of good, we unfailingly attain life - the life of 
eternity - the conclusion is inescapable that virtue _ahd 
crime are two means towards an equaL security; that it is 
optional for man to follow one or the other as he pleases; 
and that the most sordid lives and the most pure lives 
are of equal merit and dignity, since both lead to the 
same perfection and happiness. 

Once such a scheme is granted, morality, public order 
and all semblance of honesty must disappear from the 
earth. Justice is stripped of its sanction, conscience is 
a prejudice, virtue, and sacrifice are a stupid exertion. 
Remove the fear of eternal punishment from mankind and the 
world will be filled with crime; the most execrable mis- 
deeds will become a duty whenever they can be committed 
without risk of prison or the sword. Hell will simply 
happen sooner: instead of being postponed until the future 
life, it will be inaugurated in the midst of humanity, in 
the present life. As a contemporary writer has said: 
"There can be no middle way for society - it is either God 
or the gun." If there is no sanction beyond death, might 
prevails over right, the hangman becomes the pivot and 
corner-stone of the social order , and justice will be 
proclaimed in the name of death instead of being pro- 
claimed in the name of God. "Besides," remarks another 
moralist, "by virtue of what right will the courts repress 
crime, when it has the approbation of divine impunity, and 
when eternal justice undertakes not to bestir itself to 
impose its legitimate punishment?" 

The conscience of the nations has rebelled against 
this monstrous consequence. Amidst the explosion of error 
and the collapse of true belief, the doctrine of a future 
state of rewards and punishments has remained unshaken. 
It is found amongst the pagans. Virgil gave expression to 
their belief in these famous lines: 


"The vile miscreants whose souls are incurable," says 
Plato (Phaedo, "are tormented by punishments 
which convulse but do not cure them. Souls who have 
committed grave crimes are hurled into the abyss which is 
called Hell. Such is the judgement of the gods who dwell 
in Heaven: the good are reunited to the good, the wicked 
to the wicked. " 

How astonishing this assent among all men - poets, 
philosophers, peoples, kings, civilized and barbarian - to 
a truth which troubles our minds, and which men would have 
so much interest in denying! Here we might shelter behind 
the authority and weight of this fundamental axiom: Quod 
semper, quod ubique, quod ab omnibus" - "that which has 
been believed always, everywhere and by everyone - is, 
necessarily, the truth. Every dogma has been changed 
except this one.* All the important points of Catholic 
theology have given rise to dispute, except Hell which has 
escaped that common law. It has come down to us, without 
encountering one man who disputed its justice or, at 
least, cast doubt upon its awesome certainty. ine 
Protestants, who denied so many things, did not deny this. 
Destroyers of whatever most offended the human spirit, or 
penance, virginity and the value of good works, they did 

*not strip Hell of its terrifying attributes. Their hands, 
which had not respected the door of the tabernacle wherein 
the flesh of the Man-God reposes in bounty and sacrifice 
drew back from the threshold of this place of suffer- 
ing. .."

Contemporary rationalism alone has dared to go as far 
as to deny it, and, strange to say, has done so by taking 
refuge in the very bosom of divine perfection. It has 
impugned the justice, greatness and wisdom of God and, 
even while denying the Redemption, appeals to that very 
excess of love which Jesus Christ poured out as He expired 
on the Cross. 

"God," it is said, "is too perfect, too sublime, too 
noble a being to want to crush a frail creature eternally 
beneath the panoply of His power, one who has been led 
into evil, by an outburst of anger, or by weakness. That 
would be an act of vengeance and retaliation, unworthy of 
His glory and perfections." We reply that, if crime went 
unpunished, greatness would cease to be the prerogative of 
God, and would belong in its fullness to sinful man. It 
would rest with him, by a single act of his will, to make 
rebellion triumph against the divine government. So God 
must have been labouring under an illusion the day when, 
for His glory, leaving His state of repose, He enacted the 
fundamental law that the creature must tend towards Him in 
each of its aspirations, serve and love Him by constant 
acts of praise, allegiance and worship? God would then no 
longer be our essential and final end. 

Let us suppose, as some have dared to maintain, that 
Hell is merely a place of vexation and sorrow where the 
captive soul undergoes only a mitigated, limited suffer- 
ing. Let us imagine, on this supposition, Satan and his 
accomplices surpassing themselves in rebellion and pride, 
and saying to the God who rejected them: "We are in good 
shape, and we possess a tolerable enough existence for us 
to agree to do without you forever. It is true that we 
are far from possessing perfect bliss, but we have a 
quality of life and repose which is our own work, and we 
are content with it: if we are not radiant like your 
angels, at least we are not your subjects, we do not serve 
you or obey you." 

Such would be the sentiments of every creature shut 
out from God's bosom if he succeeded in rejecting his 
heritage without experiencing pain, intense and unending, 
like the happiness which he freely and obstinately spurn- 
ed. Were God, in order to alleviate the misery of the 
devils and the damned, to allow them but a shadow of good, 
a slender hope, or a drop of water to refresh them, they 
would cling to that shadow, that semblance, with all the 
strength of "their exhausted, gasping will, they would 
strive with their whole soul after that crumb of solace, 
seeking to beguile themselves with it, and to delude 
themselves as to the extent and depth of their misfortune; 
and one would have to be ignorant of man's nature to 
imagine that he would not resign himself to this mitigated 
Hell, rather than bend the knee and submit. 


 Finally, let us quote Suarez ' s argument, 
which complements and further clarifies St. Thomas's. 
"Hell," he says, "is a prison which will also serve as an 
abode for the rebellious angels and for the demons; this 
abode cannot be other than the most unpleasant, obscure 
and ignominious of all created places; it is fitting that 
it should be at opposite ends and at the greatest distance 
from the one destined for the elect. Now, the elect will 
reign eternally in the highest part of Heaven, which is 
the empyrean heaven, and so the lowest part of the earth, 
is the place where the damned will suffer their eternal 
torments . " 

Let us observe, however, that it is not a truth of: 
faith that Hell is situated in the centre of the earth. 
The Church has not defined anything on this point; it is 
simply the most probable opinion, based upon the almost 
unanimous testimony of the Doctors and Fathers.. 

And whatever may be the case, the important thing, 
as St. John Chrysostom says, is not to know where Hell is, 
but to ensure that we shall not, one day, be cast into it: 

Such, then, seems to be the place of Hell.  The 
fire which tortures the devils and the damned is a. 
material fire: a material fire which makes its action felt 
on spirits and on separated souls. It remains for us to 
consider how the implacable severity of divine justice can 
be reconciled with its infinite mercy. 

 St. John Chrysostom: Homily on the Epistle to the Romans , 


 The objection is raised that the centre of the earth 
cannot hold the multitude of the damned. However, as Suarez 
observes, after * the resurrection, Hell will be enlarged by the 
whole space of Purgatory and of the limbo of children who died 
unbaptized, which will be empty. Children who die unbaptized 
will never see God; but several Doctors express the opinion 
that they will live on the surface of the earth, where they 
will enjoy a merely natural happiness. As for the earth, its 
volume can be increased and the abyss expanded as much as 
necessary, in accordance with the words of Isaias: Dilatavit 
infernus animam suam - Therefore hath hell enlarged her soul. 
(Isaias 5:14) 

A witty man once said of the wicked: They are always 
getting in the way, in this world and in the next. In one 
sense it may be said that sinful men "get in God's way" to 
an even greater extent than the worst malefactors "get in 
the way" of human society. 

It is of faith that God desires the salvation of all 
men and that, so far as it lies with Him, He excludes no 
one from the fruits of the Redemption. He did not will- 
ingly create Hell; on the contrary, He exhausts all the 
means of His wisdom and all the secrets of His tenderness 
to forewarn us against such a misfortune, as He says by 
the mouth of Isaias: 

If God were able to suffer, no anguish would be 
comparable to the sorrow which His heart would feel when 
He is compelled to condemn a soul. The holy Cure d'Ars 
once said: "If it were possible for God to suffer, as He 
damned a soul He would be gripped with the same horror and 
the same tremor as a mother who was herself compelled to 
let the blade of the guillotine fall upon the neck of her 
child." 

Behold Jesus Christ at the Last Supper: He gazes upon 
Judas with an expression which shows sadness and the 
bitterest grief. He is violently troubled, and in the 
last extremity of consternation. He understands, better 
than we can ever conceive, how horrible is the state of a 
man adrift, irremediably lost, left without any means of 
retracing his steps and taking his destiny back into his 
own hands. He tries, by every imaginable means, to. avert 
the loss of this wretched man; He casts Himself at his 
feet and Kisses them; He admits him, despite his unworth- 
iness, to the feast of His sacred flesh; and, when the 
darkness, which more and more engulfs the obdurate soul of 
Judas, has blocked every avenue by which divine grace 
might have forced its way in, Christ weeps. He seems to 
forget that this traitor has chosen Him as the victim of 
his dastardly greed. He sees only the horror of his fate, 
and says in anquish: "It were better for him if that man 
had never been born. " 

you that accuse the Creator of harshness, and 
reproach Him for not going to the extreme limits of His 
omnipotence in order to prevent His creature from perish- 
ing eternally, tell Him your way, teach Him your secret. 
What do you want God to do? 

Would you ask Him to abolish Hell? To abolish Hell 
would be to abolish Heaven. Do you believe that the 
martyrs, anchorites, virgins and saints, at this moment 
delighting in the joys of bliss, would have kept apart 
from seductive pleasures, trampled upon worldly snares, 
sought out solitary places, come through persecutions and 
braved the hangman and the sword, if they had not had in 
mind the Master's word: "Fear ye not them that kill the 
body and are not able to kill the soul; but rather than 
fear him that can destroy both soul and body in 
Hell." 

Divine love awoke in them only when, by courageous 
mortification, they were detached from sin and sensual 
habits. The starting-point of their justification was 
fear: The thunder which 
aroused them from their slumber and lethargy was the 
terrifying word: Eternity. It was then that they looked 
upon their luxurious houses and the gilded panelling of 
their palaces, and said: This is where every day we amass 
treasures of wrath, where all seductions come together for 
our perdition. Hatred of God, flames, an endless curse 
for a day's pleasure - this is what awaits us... The next 
day these men would go barefoot, dressed in sackcloth, 
seeking the road which leads to the wilderness and the 
desert. Without these merciful fears, the City of God 
would never have filled up; we should all have strayed 
from the right path; no one would have done good, non est 
qui faciat bonum, non est usque ad unum. 

God cannot abolish Hell without abolishing Heaven. 
Shall He then wait, pardon and keep on pardoning? That is 
just what He does. In this life He never abandons even 
the person who spurns Him. He pursues him right into the 
sanctuary of his conscience, through an inner voice which 
does not cease for a single instant to make itself heard. 
In the face of the temptation which incites us to evil 
this voice rings out and calls to us: Beware! If we turn 
a deaf ear, He does not hasten to cut the thread of our 
life, as would be His right. He does not watch out for 
the moment when we go astray in order to make this the 
final moment of death for us. He comes back to us. He 
makes us feel the sting of remorse, and, not disheartened 
by our refusals, waits for years. He lets the years of 
maturity succeed the wildness of youth, and the icy hand 
of old age replace the illusions that beguile even man- 
hood: and all His efforts are in vain. A man's last hour 
finally rings; most often it is preceded by illness, the 
premonitory sign of his .approaching end. This man is 
still obdurate. One minute before his last sigh, God 
still offers to take him to Himself and save him from the 
fires of the abyss. His voice has no more strength, and 
his condition is desperate. It would be enough that, in 
the intimacy of his heart, he should utter these simple 
words: "I love you, and I repent." These words would be 
his saving grace... - and the sinner stubbornly refuses to 
say them. We ask: what can God do? Shall He, to sanctify 
the hardness of heart of this creature, overturn the whole 
plan and all the counsels of His wisdom, annihilate the 
darkness by a foolish act of omnipotence, because a be- 
sotted man has blinded himself so as to have no part in 
the divine light? Ah, God has the right to wash His hands 
and say: "0 man, thy perdition is thy work, and not mine. 
Perditio tua ex te, Israel." 



Yet why should grace and redemption be excluded from 
Hell? When a man's eyes have been opened; as he sees the 
last of his illusions crumble, and, terror-stricken, he 
realizes the full extent of his wretchedness, why would 
God not let a final ray of His mercy fall upon him? Why 
would He not hold out a hand to this unfortunate man, who 
would grasp it with a love and gratitude proportionate to 
the immensity of his deliverance? We do not hesitate to 
reply that God cannot - He cannot, at least, without 
losing His infinite dignity. He would be obliged to bow 
down, of His own accord, before a rebellious, obdurate 
creature who, far from appealing to Him*, hates and curses 
Him. Death has placed the sinner in a position which 
leaves him no choice. He knows it with a certainty which 
overwhelms his free will. He remains hardened in hatred 
and pride, magnified by his tears and despair. To arouse 
a salutary, meritorious sorrow in him, he would require a 
grace. That grace he does not seek, does not want. True, 
he abhors his punishment, but he has a supreme hatred of 
God, as well as of the gifts and lights emanating from the 
Heart of God. 

And yet, is God just, and does He not go beyond all 
proportion, when He punishes a passing fault, committed in 
a single moment, with an eternity of pains? Here, reason 
is powerless, for God is the greatest of mysteries. Sin 
is a mystery as unfathomable as the majesty of Him whom it 
offends; and the punishment due to its evil is another 
immeasurable mystery which the human mind will never 
succeed in solving. 

All we can say is that, if we consider the person of 
God, the insult offered to Him by sin is an infinite 
insult. Now as man, on account of the limitations of his 
nature, cannot sustain a punishment infinite in severity 
and intensity , it is only just that he should suffer a 
punishment infinite in duration . Human justice is the 
image and configuration of divine justice. The right to 
punish and sentence a guilty man to death is conferred 
upon earthly tribunals for the service and good of men. 
They pass sentence for crimes, not because of their intrin- 
sic deformity and because they offend God, but because 
they are harmful and prejudicial to the common good and 
the right ordering of human society. Yet they have the 
right to inflict a perpetual punishment upon a murderer 
whose crime was committed in a single moment, to remove 
him for ever from human society because he has violated 
the moral and human order. All the more reason why God 
has the right to inflict a perpetual punishment upon one 
who has violated the universal and divine order, and to 
banish him for ever from the society of Heaven. 

It is in no way repugnant, observes St. Augustine, 
that God should restrict His mercy to the years of the 
present life, so that, when these have passed, there will 
be no place for pardon. - Do not the princes of the earth 
act in the same way, when they refuse to reprieve men 
locked up in prison even though they show repentance and 
sincere detestation of the crimes which they have commit- 
ted? 

Among the various schemes devised in order to recon- 
cile God's mercy with justice, the most rational, the most 
acceptable, and the one which, at first sight, appears to 
provide a satisfactory solution to the formidable problem 
of human destiny, is the scheme conceived by Pythagoras 
and the Oriental sects, according to which, instead of 
casting a man into endless ignominy, God will introduce 
him to a second period of trials where, as in the pre- 
ceding ones, there will be a mixture of light and darkr 
ness, the path of freedom will be open- to him, and in it 
there will be temptations, divisions "and conflict between 
God, dimly perceived, and creatures who parade their 
seductions. .. -- 

Let us at once admit that, of all the doctrines 
opposed to Christianity, the doctrine of metempsychosis or 
transmigration of souls is unquestionably to be preferred. 
At a superficial glance it appears to leave belief in an 
immortal life intact, and seems not to impugn the divine 
attributes nor to deprive human law of its sanction. But, 
if we look at this doctrine in detail, we see clearly that 
it places us back amidst all the preceding difficulties, 
and raises others still more insoluble. As an illustrious 
Christian philosopher observes: "If this second life to 
which you introduce man is not purer than the first - if 
his soul dies there a second time through sin - to which 
period will God confine Himself? Shall the soul have an 
imprescriptible right to retrace the course of its migrat- 
ions, without God ever being able to restrain and punish 
it other than by giving it the right to continue to offend 
Him? Instead of that frightening prospect in which the 
judgement is seen as life's awesome barrier, the sinner 
would go to the grave, feeling as secure as a man passing 
under a portico, and would say to himself, with all the 
derision of his impunity: The universe is large, the 
centuries are long; let us first complete our passage 
through worlds and times. Let us go from Jupiter to 
Venus, from the first heaven to the second, from the 
second to the third; and if, after spaces and periods 
beyond number, it should happen that there are no more 
suns left for us, we shall present ourselves before God 
and say to Him: Here we are, our time has come; make us 
new heavens and new stars; for, if you are weary of wait- 
ing for us, we are not weary of cursing you and of manag- 
ing without you. "[260] 

Finally, we may say, love is all-powerful, with its 
own secrets and excesses, of which our hearts can have no 
inkling and, whatever may be said, cannot consent to con- 
demn forever a creature made by its own hands, redeemed by 
its own blood. Ah! We might indeed set love against 
justice if it were justice that punished. But justice was 
propitiated nineteen centuries ago, on Calvary; at the 
foot of the Cross it forgave men the debts which they had 
incurred for their crimes, casting away the sword of 
rigour, never to wield it again. 

Let us, listen to St. Paul: "Who shall accuse against 
the elect of God? God is he that justifieth. Who is he 
that shall condemn? Christ Jesus that died; yea that is 
risen also again, who is at the right hand of God, who 
also maketh intercession for us. "

It is because malediction comes from love that there 
can be no redemption therefrom. 

If it were justice that punished, love might inter- 
vene once more on the mount and say: Mercy, Father, spare 
man and, in exchange for the death that is due to him, re- 
ceive the homage of my flesh and blood! 

However, when it is the very one who is to us more 
than a brother, more than the most affectionate friend, 
who hardens that heart riven with love and changes it into 
an inexhaustible furnace of hatred, how can the ingrati- 
tude of the man who has wrought this transformation (all 
the more terrible as it is unnatural) dare to expect hope 
and refuge? 

you who, at one time or other on this earth, have 
loved with a love that is sincere, ardent and boundless: 
you know the demands and the laws of love. Love offers 
itself for a long time, insistently and abundantly; it 
suffers, dedicates itself unreservedly, humbles itself and 
becomes small. But one thing which renders it implacable, 
and which it never forgives, is obduracy in contempt, 
contempt maintained until the end. 

Go, then, ye cursed, the Saviour will say on the day 
of His- judgement: Ite maledicti. I did everything for 
you; I gave My life, My blood, My divinity and My person 
for you. And in return for My infinite generosity, I 
asked only for these simple words: I obey and I love You. 
You have constantly spurned Me and have responded to My 
approaches solely with these words: Go, I prefer my gross 
concerns and my brutish pleasures to You. 

Be your own judges, the Saviour will add. What sen- 
tence would you pronounce against the most dearly beloved 
creature who displayed the same indifference and same 
obstinacy towards you? 

It is not I who condemn you, it is you who have 
damned yourselves. You have chosen, of your own free 
will, the city where egotism, hatred and revolt have 
established their dominion. I return to Heaven where My 
angels are, and thither I bring back this Heart, the 
object of your insults and scorn. Be the children of your 
own choice, stay with yourselves, with the worm that does 
not die and the fire that is never extinguished. 

Let us tremble, but let us also be penetrated with a 
lively and unshakable confidence! Damnation is a work of 
love. It is the incarnate mercy which will determine our 
fate and convey the eternal sentence. It is easy to avert 
it while the present life lasts. Love in this world never 
requires a perfect parity between the fault and the pen- 
alty. It is content with little - a sigh, a sign of 
goodwill. Jesus Christ opens His Heart to us, the price 
of His blood and His conquest. He destines eternity for 
us; not an eternity of tears and suffering, but an eter- 
nity of bliss which we shall possess with Him, in the 
bosom of His Father, in union with the Holy Ghost and in 
the very centre of His glory. Amen. 


https://archive.org/stream/TheEndOfThisPresentWorldAndTheMysteriesOfTheLifeToCome/EndOfThisPresentWorldAndMysteriesOfTheLifeToCome-FatherCharlesArminjon_djvu.txt