Not all men loved the Queen

 https://www.unz.com/article/elizabeth-the-evil-a-malign-monarch-dies-and-is-succeeded-by-chuck-the-cuck/

At the Blog Vox Cantoris I suggested one way to measure what the Queen had meant to England was to compare what England looked like when she came into power - the racial make-up, literature, music, art, architecture, crime rate etc - and compare that with those same items a year before she died.

Then I said that a defense of her was she had no power to effect those items and that is the point, isn't it?

Not so, it is much much worse.

https://vdare.com/articles/monarchy-nation-states-and-the-failed-reign-of-elizabeth-the-useless

She was an empty symbol who lived a life of luxury and only bestirred herself to help the enemies of civilisation; couldn't even bring herself to oppose the systematic rape of thousands and thousands of young white English women by non-white immigrants.

Sobran was right:

“The US Constitution serves the same function as the British royal family: it offers a comforting symbol of tradition and continuity, thereby masking a radical change in the actual system of power.”