La Civilta Cattolica The Jewish Question (3)

 

Part III: The Remedies

La Civilta Cattolica, Series XIV, Vol. VIII, Fascicule 972, 9 December 1890

__________________________________

Introduction

Some years ago, a French writer concluded one of his strong works on the Jewish invasion of his fatherland with an analysis that contained, in substance, what follows.

The French Christians ought never to forget that these Jews with barbarian names and of barbarian origin, most of whom don't even possess citizenship, in less than a century have become our masters. Their invasion occurred in three phases: in that of 1791, when all of the national institutions collapsed; in that of 1815, when France fell prostrate; and in 1870, when the German weapons had mutilated France.

When in 1789 the era of revolution against the hegemony of the nobility and the clergy opened, what militated against these two ranks of our civilization and their ownership of two-thirds of French soil? Taine recently justified the origins of this ownership. The nobility had formed by defending the territory against the external enemies and thus procuring security and glory for the nation. The clergy had well deserved the credit for civilizing the nation, refining its customs and enriching it through scholarship, through monuments, and through thousands of different charitable institutions.

The Revolution's Expropriation of Clergy and Religious

The clergy's possessions were estimated at about 4 billion. But in 1789 were counted at least 130,000 clergymen and religious in France. Consequently, the capital, divided up among them, was reduced to about 30,000 francs per person, thus to a profit of 1,500 per person. Accordingly, there was no question of great things, unless one had taken into consideration the great number of people who managed to live from these profits, and the innumerable alms they gave everywhere. In spite of this, such a legitimate patrimony was classified as an enormous abuse and confiscated.

A hundred years later, no longer 130,000 of our priests or religious, but 60,000 not at all French, but foreign, Jews, who constitute not at all a state illustrious for its excellent merits of the fatherland, but rather a voracious mob of immigrated cosmopolitans have snatched up, in our own house, not only 4 billion, but very well 90 billion. 

"Kidnapping of the Faith": Search for a Proper Defense

And now, being lords over the public trust, they ardently desire to blind the common people, urging them against the clergy and thus hiding their monstrous wealth by means of the people's most wicked passions. Oh wonder, during the first revolution, the clergy were reproached with their 4 billion; and today, nobody wonders to see that the fortune of one single family of Hebrews (that of the Rothschilds), which has come in order to plunder us completely within a little more than sixty years, amounts to this same sum. What's more, this race, not content with bleeding us, makes every effort to kidnap from us the faith of Christ and all that is most beautiful in our culture!

Thus, in the end, the passionate French writer exclaimed: French Christians, let us unite to thwart the wicked conspiracy; let us form a defense league against these enemies of our name, our tribe, our beliefs and our patriotic traditions.

A similar cry begins to be heard in other countries, and might soon even arise in those where it is not heard yet, but will be heard ere long, when it won't help much any longer.

History and Current Defense Leagues

But will this defense league, whose formation is so much hoped for, really be one of the effective remedies for resolving the Jewish question, that with each passing day becomes more abominable for the people who languish, being oppressed and put in its chains? 

Those who know their history realize that the problem of predominance of Jews over Christians is as old as Christianity itself. There is no country which wouldn't find recorded in its history a frequent change from permission for Jews to remain within its borders to their solemn expulsion, because of their abuses and misdemeanors. But up to our century, the Hebrew tribe was merely tolerated in the Christian kingdoms, being viewed with permanent suspicion as hostile, foreign and malevolent, and subject to special laws of exception, which constituted the common defense against their residing in those territories.

The Role of Equal Rights

At present this is no longer the case. Thanks to the principles of the revolution, which he has used practically everywhere, the Jew has got the benefit of the common law: the laws consider him equal to the others in all respects and protect him just as well as the other citizens. Thus the defense policy of Christian society has been abolished and the Jew has been granted the complete freedom to turn against the same societies which give him refuge in their midst. 

This is the most important conquest of liberty, which Judaism was able to obtain through Freemasonry, wherever it is subject to it and constitutes its ally.

But in order to make them last, the Jew has striven to eliminate everything that was historical and national in the institutions of the different states, by reducing all of them, some more and some less, except Russia, to such a form of government which was to insure that the bulk of power rested in the hands of the oligarchies, directly or indirectly depending upon him, as for instance, the modern parliaments, which pretend, through a continuous legal fiction, to govern in the name of national sovereignty but in fact impose on us the few who quite legally tyrannize all the others. 

Jewish Rights vs. the Plundered

Once established as axioms of public law, the principles of equality for everyone in all things and the right of the predominating parties to govern the nation, and the state without religion, Judaism was able through the instrument of Masonry to attain the apex of power which inebriates it and to dominate the Christian people in order to plunder, corrupt and trample them, as it is doing now in most of Europe.

Thus, the strongest weapon of defense against oppressive Judaism is broken in the Christians' fists, and as long as the insidious rights of man, promulgated in 1789, and the parliamentary statutes being in vogue today are maintained, there is no human hope for liberation of Christians from the Judaeo-Masonic yoke which wears down and perverts the populations.

Nevertheless, the previously quoted writer who invites Christians to band together in a defense league, justly demonstrates its necessity with these all too true words:

Grasp it, Catholics, grasp it, all of you who, although you might not follow the religion of Jesus, are born Christians, that is, children of civilized parents: the Jews, barbarians still in the 19th century, keep their ancient offensive force, and they not only keep it, but increase it a hundredfold by their assaults through the breaches opened to them by the revolution, and certain of victory, they rush on us. And you, you have lost the right to defend yourselves; faced with an already half-victorious enemy, you have remained disarmed. Therein is the danger that arises a thousand times over the risks of our conflicts with prevailing Judaism in the past. By virtue of which principles or rights could the revolution ever repel its invasion? The state is atheistic or at least declares itself neutral towards the religions, and leaves the field not to the best one, but to that one which is the most audacious in plotting. Additionally the state has promulgated absolute equality of all citizens, unrestricted liberty, and, on this condition, society turns into a tumultuary struggle between diverse and opposing forces, of which the most powerful will get the upper hand. And, unfortunately, the most powerful force is always the most malicious one, that in the choice of weapons doesn't even shrink from dishonesty.

Defense Proposals

This established, we wish to report, as already announced,upon some proposals by publicists who are not at all driven by socialist envy of the Hebrews' wealth, but rather animated with a zeal for religion and fatherland which, by the way, one would prefer being better moderated by justice.

So, in Germany, Austria and France, there is a school of thought which advances a remedy for liberation from the Jewish plague, that, per se, would be the most radical of all, but that wouldn't conform to the Christian spirit and whose realization would be impossible at present.

A Just War?

After proving with hundreds of facts and documents that, in general, the Hebrews are a plague on Christian society, and a scourge on the Church of Jesus Christ, they demonstrate that the right of making war against them, as public enemies, is manifest. But since it doesn't beseem to resort to bloodshed, they restrict things which should be done to two points: That the Jew return what he has stolen; that he be banished from our territory afterwards. Through confiscation of his property and through exile the great evil done by him to the countries that have given him legal equality is to be recompensed and his pernicious ungratefulness towards their culture is to be punished.

That confiscation would be just, who can doubt? Most of the treasures possessed by the Jews are ill-gotten, gathered by fraud, usury, and embezzlement. If no end is imposed on this scandalous accumulation, then in a few decades almost all of the Christians' liquid and fixed assets will have fallen prey to them.

It is absolutely legitimate, if not always for particular individuals, then certainly for the plundered nation, to recover the ill-gotten gain from the thieves.

Expropriation: the Lesser of Two Evils

What else? Even if supposed but not admitted that the Jews' accumulated goods had been acquired justly, but also supposed that one has the legitimate right to wage war against them, then one has certainly the right, too, to impose upon them the lesser evil of confiscation. Add to this that gold is the most powerful weapon by which Jews exterminate religion and oppress the people; consequently, in regard to necessary defense, one has at least the right to seize this weapon from them.

And if one had no other reason, then nevertheless, one would have the right to compensation for the inestimable material and moral damages which they have done to the Christian people.

So here we have the case wherein the memorable sentence of the illustrious Peter the Venerable comes true: Serviant populis christianis, etiam invitis ipsis, divitiae Judaeorum: although unwillingly, give the benefit of the riches gathered by the Jews superabundantly to the Christians. 

This first part of the remedy would result in what, some years ago at a meeting of anti-Semites, was expressed under the form of a wish: That to the Jews should be applied the very same laws which they themselves caused and allowed against the Church and promulgated by the Freemasons ruling in the Catholic countries. That by a decree of only two lines, all of the goods of the Jews, with no exception, be proclaimed nationalized. All at once there would be enough to pay off the public debts of the states.

Christian Justice and Charity

It is not our intention to critically examine this formulated proposal more in depth. Suffice it to say that history abounds with examples of its implementation. But in order to be legitimate, first of all such a confiscation would have to be decreed by those who in the nations regularly exercise public authority. And secondly, it would have to be carried out according to a certain norm of justice and Christian charity.

Not all of the Hebrews are thieves, swindlers, cheats, usurers, Freemasons, cads, and corrupters of customs. Everywhere one can count among them a certain number who are not complicit in the trickeries of the others. How could it be justified to include these innocents in the punishment deserved by the perpetrators? 

The supporters of the drastic remedy answer that even in the most just and most holy wars, a great number of innocents also perish; that without distinction, all of the Hebrews act in solidarity with each other; that they altogether nurture a mortal hatred of the Christian in their hearts; that all of them, in one way or another, contribute to his destruction; that the experience of former times has shown how the Hebrew has always abused the mercy and charity of Christians, in order to take revenge and persecute them; and that consequently, this law of necessary self defense, which is not to be confounded with revenge, must take priority over every consideration. Salus populi, suprema lex esto [Let the people's welfare be the supreme law]. 

Since at present we are only dealing with a sketch, which for the present will certainly not be depicted more in detail, we'll leave it at that. Suffice it to add that, by all means, justice and charity would have to be vindicated for good reasons versus the rigor of its overly draconian measures.

The Remedy of Exile

But the confiscation would not be enough, the champions of that remedy insist; indeed, it would be of very little use if the common enemy was granted refuge on the state's own territory. One ought not to say: Death to the Jew! but rather, one ought to say: Out with the Jew! He may live, but far from us.

A French author writes:

More than ten centuries is enough to prove that between our tribe and that of the Hebrews runs an incompatibility of humours that is totally insurmountable. We will never be able to live together without the greatest risks. Already in the epoch of the Renaissance, Bishop Simone Maiolo, in his famous book, De perfidia Judaeorum [On the Perfidy of the Jews}, taught the Christians the only solution remaining for them in order to liberate themselves from these implacable enemies of their name, their fatherland, their faith, their peace, their goods, whom he called traitors, most felonious knaves of the human race, an army of quarrelers, rascals (furciferi), the scourge of decent men and unworthy of being tolerated. To concede to them, as did the revolution, the right of citizenship, was to unleash vampires on the country, was to open, out of a sentiment of humaneness, to a menagerie of ferocious beasts the doors of their cages. This race has no right to reside on our soil. If they are there, then it is either in order to take it away from us Christians, or in order to conspire to the detriment of our faith. We are faced with an enemy who aspires to deprive us of earth and heaven.

We limit ourselves to observing that, once more, the universal banishment of Jews from entire reigns and states has many examples. But the banishment was legitimate because it proceeded from the legitimate authority. If, by the way, this remedy had to be applied in all of the civilized countries, where on earth would be found a place for the eight million Jews who dispersedly squat everywhere?

"Let them go wherever they please," repeats the same writer; "their damnation is to wander forever as vagabonds. Well, then let them wander through the world. We shall not cease to repeat the ancient prayer of the holy liturgy: 

Auferte gentem perfidam Credentium de finibus. [Remove the perfidious people from the believers' territory.]"

However much this wholesale banishment, as it would be called today, could be justified in certain circumstances and in particular countries, although in practice it wouldn't be universally feasible: it nevertheless contradicts the plans of God, Who through His prophets' mouths, has made the cursed Israel scattered to all parts of the world a palpable proof of Christianity's truth.

Otherwise has always been the attitude of the Church, of the Popes, and of the Catholic princes toward this people, who for almost twenty centuries is afflicted with the curse of deicide: Sanguis eius (Jesu) super nos et super filios nostros [His blood (of Jesus) be upon us and upon our children],²⁹ as the synagogue of Caiphas called it down upon itself and its offspring. 

Yet, citing the Lehmann brothers who converted from Judaism: 

The Popes have always benevolently permitted the Hebrews to sojourn in their city. This errant people was free to go or not to go there, but it has always gone there, and in gratitude it called Rome the Hebrews' Paradise.

And the kings mostly imitated the Popes. They tolerated the Jews' presence in their states, but through wise laws protected the faith and possessions of their Christian subjects. 

Even supposing that the remedy of universal banishment of the Hebrews was feasible now, it would not accord with the Roman Church's way of thinking and acting.

Moral Order Arguments

The followers of a more moderate school make various and more or less effective suggestions for driving back the Jewish hegemony, which nevertheless are very difficult to carry out at the present time.

Besides those suggestions of moral order concerning the relation of the Christians to the Hebrews, and the political ones regarding the freedom of press, the main force of Jewish power, as well as the tolerance of the masonic sect, they also present economic or social proposals, among which rank first those referring to the ownership of land and to so-called capitalism.

It is clear that the usurious loans granted by the Hebrews via real estate mortgages, year by year facilitate the transfer of the national territory from ownership by Christians to that by Hebrews. In Austria it is estimated that, in this way, about 10,000 farms fall into Jewish hands every year; in France, Italy, and elsewhere things don't look much different. If things will be going on like this, the point will be reached where the arable land of these various nations will turn into vast estates owned by a handful of foreign Croesuses whom the people will serve as slaves.

Now, here is the remedy for such a great evil that presents itself: a law composed of two simple, little articles: (1) Each foreigner is forbidden all ownership of rural land in the country; (2) Jews are equalized with foreigners.

Equal Respect, Different Rights

The first article would be a completely just measure of defense and protection for the nation. Note, that the prohibition would be restricted solely to rural property: foreigners would still be allowed to own urban property. As to the second article, it would be required because of the peculiarity of the Jew, who, among us, is always a cosmopolitan, since he is, aside from the simple fact of being born in Germany, England or Italy, always but a Jew, and never a German, Englishman or Italian. And this cosmopolitanism of their tribe is admitted by the Jews themselves.

De Pascal had this to say:

Thus it won't be helpful to resort to the dalliance of "equality" and "equal rights". To want equal rights under unequal social conditions is to want equal confections for unequal statures. What is just, what is necessary, what is equal, one of our great statesmen used to say, is equal respect for unequal rights. Our ancestors understood this quite well, and for this reason their edifice of state stood in a beautiful harmony after all, and not in this anarchy which is deplored today.³⁰

But this external defense would have to be combined with a wise internal regulation of property, especially of the smaller and the quite tiny one, by means of which it would be protected from usury's eagerness for plunder. Wherever no such guarantees will be established, the proletariat of the cities will be overly crowded by those of the country: people who, loosed from the ties binding them to the soil, and left without fatherland, without roof, without bed, will fall into the hands of whoever will know how to exploit them in order to revolutionize society.

However, little would be won if at the same time one didn't arm, by good laws, against the abuses of capitalism, the main nerve of today's Jewish power in Europe. The so-called liberty of money transactions, behind which is hidden the most execrable infamies of usury, is tantamount to the ruin of the economic order of nations, as is the freedom of the press to their moral, political, and religious orders. Dr. Ratzinger justly states that

The expropriation of society, using fluid capital, is carried out with exactly the same precision as the laws of nature. If nothing is done to stop it, in 50, or at most, 100 years, all of European society will be abandoned, bound wrists and ankles, to the discretion of a few dozen Hebrew bankers.

It isn't necessary for our purposes to look into the particulars of the manifold reforms that this school, circumspectly, animated by the best intentions, and reconciling the rights of the Christian people with charity and justice due to the Hebrews, expounds and illustrates in order to free Christianity from the oppression inflicted by Judaism. 

Ultimate Defense: Setting Aside Civil Equality

But as long as Christianity doesn't shed the political yoke of Masonry, it will be vain to propose and discuss possible solutions for liberation. The only solution and, at the same time the most reliable one, is to turn back and retake the way where one has gone astray. If the Hebrews are not put in their place by humane and Christian laws, certainly, but nevertheless by laws of exception which deprive them of civil equality, to which they have no right and which is even no less pernicious for them than it is for Christians, little or nothing will be accomplished. Seeing the inevitability of their presence in the various countries; seeing their unalterable nature of their being foreigners in every country, and of their being enemies of each country that tolerates them, and of their being a society always separated from the societies in which it lives; seeing the Talmud's morality that they follow, and the fundamental dogma of their religion which impels them to seize, by any means whatsoever, the goods of all peoples, because it assigns to their race the possession of, and the domination over, all the world; seeing that the experience of many centuries, and that one which we are undergoing at present, has proven and still proves, that the legal equality with Christians conceded to them in the Christian states results either in their oppression of Christians or in their slaughter by Christians, there emerges the consequence that the only way of reconciling the Hebrews' residence with the Christians' rights is to regulate it with such laws which, at the same time, impede the Hebrews from offending the Christians' welfare, and impede the Christians from offending that of the Hebrews.

And this is just what, in a more or less perfect manner, has been done in the past; this is what, for a century, the Hebrews have tried to abolish; but this is also what, sooner or later, willingly or unwillingly, will have to be restored, and perhaps the Hebrews themselves will be constrained to ask that it be restored. For the predominance to which today's revolutionary law has helped them is digging an abyss under their feet, whose depth corresponds to the height to which they have risen. And at the first burst of the storm they are provoking by their very predominance at present, they will suffer such an enormous ruin, heralding an event as unequaled in their history as their modern audacity is also unequaled and with which they have trampled the nations that have madly exalted them.

(Forty three years after this was published, Hitler was named Chancellor)

Conversion to Christianity?

There is no lack of writers who opinion that the Jewish question is to be resolved by Israel's conversion to Christianity and that this is going to be that triumph for the Church which will prepare the end of the world. For one omen of end-times will precisely consist in the return of the Hebrews to the God handed over by them to the Cross on Calvary. This conversion, of which clear signs were already seen, would anew redound to the Church's advantage the immense wealth possessed by Judaism, and also the unlimited influence it exercises nearly everywhere now.

No Sign of Conversion

That the entry of apostate Israel into the sheep-fold of Christ be one of the signs given in Sacred Scripture as preceding the end of the world is beyond any doubt. But that the signs of such an entry would already show we wouldn't know how to become convinced of this. His dispersed and errant people, which always must exist, so that they testify to the belief in Jesus Christ, not only through the patrimony of the Scriptures they preserved, but also by their very condition, remain still today the same that they became after the destruction of Jerusalem: a people without a king, without a priesthood, without a temple, without a fatherland, without hope, and the most embittered enemy of the Name and the Church of Jesus Christ, Who was crucified by their ancestors. But that they would begin to take a turn for the better, and to embrace as their Savior, Jesus, Whom they have killed, of this we discern neither clear nor vague indications. 

False vs. True Conversions

There are those who see such indications in the possession of the right of civil equality which it [i.e., Israel] enjoys almost everywhere now. From this it follows, some claim, that many Jews have turned incredulous and profess no religion at all except that of the golden calf, and that many others, through their more liberal intermingling with the Christian, have been brought near to the Church, whose bosom at present they enter without making a great stir, but in considerable numbers.

If we limit ourselves to what is visible and palpable and what we have proven at length, it seems to us that it can be said that equality conceded to the Hebrews by the anti-Christian sect [i.e., Freemasonry], wherever it has usurped the government of the peoples, has produced the effect of uniting Hebraism with Freemasonry in the persecution of the Catholic Church, and of elevating the Jewish race in its occult power as well as in its manifest abundance of wealth over the Christians. That not a few Israelites become Protestant, or rather feign joining the nationalistic Christianity of the Lutherans, Calvinists, Anglicans, and so on, is well known, but it is also well known that they are induced to these feigned conversions by everything except religious reasons. That others turn from the synagogue to Catholicism may be authentic in case they do so secretly; but exactly because being done secretly, such conversions do not suffice at all for constituting a recognizable sign.

In every century, for the rest, God has attracted, in varying measure, considerable numbers of Jews to His Church, sometimes more, sometimes less, and it would not be proper to compare the converts of our time with those of past epochs. But it is certain that at present, Judaism, taken as a whole, shows itself incomparably more inclined to hatred and suppression of Christianity than to benevolence toward it and its edification. And the satanism because of which Masonry has waged its campaign against all of what it knows to be Catholic, isn't nurtured more insidiously by anything other than by the Israelites' pen, machinations, suggestions and gold. 

Thus, if the resolution of the Jewish question in Europe had to be postponed until the mission of Enoch and Elias, we think that before there would still be enough time to see Europe become, for long centuries, one single, huge plantation, exploited by the Jews through the labor and sweat of the Christians reduced to slavery. Accordingly, this is no remedy in which we can acquiesce, since it is, on the one hand, too fantastic, and on the other, too remote.

A Divine Judgment

What must be the true solution of the problem, and the radical cure for the Jewish disease in Europe, has been clearly demonstrated, as has also been demonstrated the practical impossibility to resort to this cure as long as there are governments which continue to replace the ten commandments, the faith, and the Gospel of Christ with the principles glorified by the French revolution. If the Christian societies, having been removed from the Church of Jesus Christ, won't return to Her, they will wait in vain for their liberation from the iron yoke of the Jews. As long as sin will endure, punishment also will endure and even intensify. 

The Greeks' apostasy was punished by the Mohammedans, who destroyed their empire. Heaven's chosen instrument of anger for punishing the degenerate Christianity of our time is the Hebrews. Their power over Christianity is continually increasing, along with the predominance of that evil spirit in it that followed up the rights of God with the rights of man in its bosom. The justice of the Eternal makes use of the most apostate and most cursed people in order to scourge the apostasy of the nations more favored by His mercy.

The Example of France

France sets an example of this. She has just celebrated the first centenary of that revolution which separated her from God, the Church, and her kings. But how did she celebrate this solemnity? France prostrated herself in the dust of the Masonic temple of Solomon, humiliated under the feet of the talmudic synagogue, as a slave of a swarm of foreign vultures who have already drained three fifths of her ancestors' patrimony from her. And thus, the revolution of 1789 has yielded her the glorious profit of passing from the noble submission to her most Christian kings over to the ignoble servitude of the kings of Mammon.

The Example of Italy

Different from France is Italy. She is that country to whom, for quite thirty years, more than to the other nations, Freemasonry has instilled the poison of those liberties which have nearly killed France. And the effects seem most deplorable, not only in political, economic, or moral aspects, in which she resembles her elder sister more and more, but also in the enslavement to the ghetto, which by means of Masonry brings Italy under its subjection more each year.

Evangelical Justice

Well, let there form leagues of Christians who want somehow to stop the flood of Judaism that rushes in and, being free from any restraint, devastates along with the material wealth also the most previous treasures of our faith and our civilization; well, let the people disseminate the idea of the necessity for public welfare, to confine this pernicious river to its ancient bed again, by just laws; let the people write, print, speak, struggle towards that, always within the limits permitted by the Gospel. But let no one who possesses genuine love of religion and of his country become weary, everywhere, again and again, of continually driving in the nail of this great truth: that for the nations who have jointly apostatized from the Church in order to follow the masonic pretences, modern Hebrews constitute the scourge of divine justice, and that the whole sweetness of liberalism will result in their being lured into the embrace of the voracious octopus of Judaism. 

The Bourgeoisie's Role

Toussenel, Proudhon, Lafargue, and a hundred others predicted what would necessarily be the resolution of the Jewish question in Europe. As the barbarians from outside resolved the Jewish question of the most decayed Roman world, thus the barbarians from inside will resolve the present one which has arisen from the so-called reigning or bourgeois class that has been seduced, inebriated, and corrupted to the marrow by Judaism. Hasn't it refused, out of hatred for Christ, any social reform that was based on Christian justice as its basis? Well, the new Attila will be unleashed upon their republics, their monarchies, their institutions, their stock exchanges, their theaters, their factories, their places of entertainment, and he will bring them to ruin along with the Jews. Haven't they jointly repudiated the Lord's Anointed? They will jointly take delight in Barabbas. And when Barabbas will have treated them as they deserved, the Lord's Anointed will return to His house and demonstrate that it remains true forever: that whoever raises his horn[s] against Him will, being conquered, end up licking the dust of His feet pulverem pedum tuorum lingent. ³¹

Roman Numeral Notes

(author anonymous)

i. We see this in the 20th century rise of National Socialism. 19th Marxism was converted in Heaven to German Socialism and 19th century Zionism into German Nationalism. Rabbi Eichanan Wasserman, in Epoch of the Messiah (Copyright 1985 by Rabbi E.S. Wasserman, Los Angeles, CA 90069) writes: 

Nowadays, Jews have chosen two [idols] to which they offer up their sacrifices. They are Socialism and Nationalism. The new gospel of Nationalism can be defined briefly as "Let us be like the nations." All that is required of the Jew is national feeling. He who pays the Shekel and sings Hatikvah is thereby exempted from the precepts of the Torah. It is clear that this idea is considered to be fundamentally idol-worship from the point of view of the Torah. These forms of idol-worship have poisoned the minds and hearts of the Hebrew Youth. Each one has its tribe of false prophets in the shape of writers and speakers, who do their work to perfection. A miracle has happened in Heaven: these two idolatries have been merged into one National Socialism. There has been formed from them a fearful rod of wrath which hits at the Jews in all corners of the globe. The abominations to which we have bowed down strike back at us. "Thy sin shall punish thee." 

Thus, National Socialism was invented in Heaven as a measure-for-measure punishment to the Jews for their perfidy. Here La Civilt Cattolica is prophetic. 

A similar interpretation to that of Rabbi Wasserman's treating Hitler as a kind of Attila punishing the Jews for their sins is from Rabbi Avigdor Miller in his tape number 347 [Rabbi Miller Tapes, 2002 Avenue J, Brooklyn, New York 11210]. Rabbi Miller in this tape considers Adolf Hitler a Providential punishment on the Jews for their sins. Another work by I. Domb, entitled, The Transformation, is available from The Jewish Guardian [P.O. Box 2143, Brooklyn New York, 11202]. 

ii. We would say more than ninety percent of the Talmud is pharisaical. See "Commentary on Terms." 

iii. See Genesis 9:27. 

iv. Those comments of the Rabbis of today are not found in the 6th century Gemara itself, but their Pharisaical views are considered by them as one tradition with the Talmud. 

v. The messianism can be found in various Jewish apostasies completely unconnected to the Bible. First is the usury system that underlies all modern Jewish power. That this system, as all non-Biblical systems, is a death system, was demonstrated by Aristotle in his Politics, 1:3:23. Once all the gold in the system is lent out, the gold cannot generate its own children or liquidity to pay the interest. For example, if 140,000 tonnes of gold are lent out at 10%, and there are only 140,000 tonnes of gold in the world, it is impossible that 154,000 tonnes of gold could be paid at the end of the year when it is due. The 14,000 tonnes of gold would not exist. Defaults follow. So, the Jewish usurer in the Middle Ages gathered all the nation's wealth into his hands until he was expelled. St. Thomas Aquinas, in The Summa Theologica, in "Of the Sin of Usury," (Q 78, Art 1, Part 11-11) wrote: "I answer that, to take usury for money lent, is unjust in itself because this is to sell what doesn't exist…" 

The 18th and 19th centuries introduced, via Jewish usurers such as the Rothschilds, the fraudulent paper and credit systems as described by J. W. von Goethe in The Tragedy of Faust, Part 2. Here the liquidity, or children, were artificially created in the form of paper and credit to service the interest, but this system is also against nature and God as it fraudulently creates value out of nothing. (See Lev.19:36 that legislates against this fraud; Ex: 22:25; Lev. 25:36,37, and Deut. 23:19, 20 for usury prohibitions.) Since the usury relentlessly continues to accumulate, the paper and credit must continuously be created by the central and the private banks to pay the interest until the system becomes so fractionalized that it disintegrates, as in Germany between 1914-1923. 

As this fractionalization took place, the Rothschilds "manipulated the quantity and flow of money so that they were able to influence, if not control, governments on one side and industries on the other." (Tragedy and Hope, page 51, by Carroll Quigley, 1966, The Macmillan Co., N.Y.). If the Rothschilds wanted to get rid of a government, they would contract the supply of credit through their controlled central bank, creating a depression and political upheaval, as the Parisian Baron Edouard de Rothschild did between 1929-1932 in the United States to get rid of the protectionist Republicans who were moving to disrupt their international loans. Of course, they sell their asset portfolio before the crash, and buy back the assets afterwards. The enormous wealth thus accumulated is used to foster such heresies as Talmudic Ricardianism, Talmudic Darwinism, Talmudic Marxism, Talmudic Freudianism, and Talmudic Einsteinism, which will be treated in further footnotes. Therefore, fiat currency and credit are merely pharisaical control mechanisms. 

vi. In Hebrew, goy means nation, and can refer in the Hebrew Bible to the Israelite nation, but in the Talmud, it mostly refers to non-Jews. 

vii. Russian independence from Jewish financial control was ended by a calculated series of events started by Parisian Baron Edouard de Rothschild who arranged the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria at Sarajevo in 1914 to draw the weak Russian state into a European war to end the Tsarist regime. It was rather surprising to the Parisian Baron that the Russian Tzar held on so long, which forced him into planning the Bolshevik Revolution in 1918 by having his Agent, Parvus, engineer through the German government the transfer of Lenin in a sealed railway car from Switzerland to Russia with his Jewish crew. The later suppression in the western press of the atrocities being committed in Russia was carried out by the Rothschild forces as Russia fell under a Jewish dictatorship more ruthless, brutal and murderous than anything ever before seen in history. We refer to the recently published Black Book of Communism for a detailed account.

viii. Historically, many of these rights and privileges were given through Jewish bribery of the aristocracy, or of public officials. 

ix. The so-called political economists as David Ricardo or Milton Friedman are essentially Talmudic apologists for economic doctrines of the cut-throat competition used in an economic contraction to consolidate and monopolize industries under Jewish private banking control. These economic doctrines were applied by Charles Darwin to the survival of the fittest doctrine and natural selection. The Jewish newspapers touted Talmudic Darwinism as a means to destroy the Biblical basis of Christian civilization. The vile idea that man emerged from an animal has never been witnessed by the human eye, but was nevertheless used to destroy God's account of Adam and Eve. The Jews were confounded when, in our century, Adolf Hitler turned the tables on them and characterized them as the inferior species unfit to survive and slated them to be destroyed as the Jewish Bolsheviks like Kaganovich had liquidated the 10 million Christian families in the Ukraine in the Kulak class liquidations; and so the Jews were punished measure-for-measure. It is important to note that, just as Talmudic sexology is contrary to Scripture, reason and natural law, so is Darwin's Descent of Man contrary to Scripture and empirical natural evidence (i.e., what we can see). 

x. Here is an appropriate place to discuss the Jewish sexual science, Talmudic Freudianism. The philosophy can be found in the homosexual, Oscar Wilde's, The Picture of Dorian Gray, the part in which Lord Henry Wotton proclaims: "The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it."Dr. Freud's contention is that repression of the sexual urge causes mental illness. In the movie, "Splendor in the Grass," made some decades ago, Natalie Wood, who plays the lead, ends up in the Kansas Meninger Hospital for resisting sex on a date, while the fornicating girls are depicted as emotionally healthy. The real problem of Miss Wood's character was that it is unhealthy, in the first place, to stir up sinful feelings, and then to repress them. Rather, the healthy way is not to kiss on dates and not to arouse oneself until marriage. 

During my visits to the Meninger Hospital, my discussions with both doctors and patients found no patients there suffering because of holy continence. Rather, I found most girls suffering from guilt and disorientation caused by sexual misdeeds. The Talmudic Freudian psychiatrists' goal there was to free the patients from illness by taking away the guilt of their sins. Here is the new Jewish monastery, a whorehouse, and the priesthood, psychiatrists. Their mystery, as in the evolutionism of Darwinism, is the (unseen) unconscious. 

During the 1930s, Dr. Carl Jung answered the Freudians, who based their sexology on the unconscious Oedipus complex archetype, by saying the racial national spirit of Adolf Hitler and the German people came from their unconscious and was the German archetype, while the Jewish archetype was the Oedipus complex. This is a rather farcical game, as the unconscious is, by definition, unknown. 

Unfortunately, Freud dominates our school systems and a perfidious sex education is taught, promoting vices such as masturbation, sodomy and kindred perversions.

xi. The school texts are infected with Talmudic Einsteinism and Marxism. It is easy to see that Karl Marx's ideas are foolish, since he tries to create equality of result instead of equality of opportunity, thereby destroying all incentives. God divided the land of Israel equally (Numbers: 26:54), but not the fruits of the work (Prov. 20:4). We wonder why the Rothschilds and other Jewish plutocrats desire to concentrate so much wealth when the Bible's equality of landholding and the Jubilee (Lev. 25:25-28) prevented such permanent concentration, except that we know that is their tool for one-world domination. And, of course, the answer is that they are rebels against the Bible and God so no monstrosity is beyond their Luciferian plotting. 

Dr. Einstein is less easy to understand. Suffice it to say that our eyes see that the earth is not moving and the sun orbits the earth. Galileo never proved otherwise, but his "theory" that the Bible's geocentricity was wrong, using meaningless, disconnected empirical data promoted the empirical movement, which encouraged the idea that truth could be found by examining a stupendous number of facts, and that the patterns of fact could challenge the Bible. This was contrary to the Aristotelian method of investigation which searched for the nature of the problem and once found, used the analysis to organize the empirical data somewhat as theories do today. But Aristotle used deductive logic from things that were real and known, rather than inferential logic from things unknown as Plato and today's scientists. 

Here is an example. When Aristotle observed that a baby was born from a man and a woman, he deduced that in the past that was always the way. He saw what was real and deduced conclusions from it. However, the Darwinists see a scale of species, and infer one species was born from another, though they never saw such a thing. (The ancients had such beliefs, as Helen of Troy being born from a swan's egg, which today would be called a form of punctuated equilibrium.) 

The Darwinists then launch into gigantic empirical data searches to prove linkages through graded species, though there is no visible evidence one was born from the other, and become lost in the confusion of data. Aristotle's method saves us from becoming detoured into such irrelevant data searches which have encumbered our entire educational system which murders the innocent souls of our children with millions of irrelevant "facts." We are sure the Pharisees want this intellectual confusion to facilitate their control. 

So, they never proved a pattern of facts that could repudiate Biblical creation, but merely showed the differing species that God created on an ascending scale, and call it evolution. You could just as easily say the scale indicated the descent of the species and call it de-volution. The connection between these species is never proved as having evolved because no one ever saw one come out of another, and thus modern science is counter-intuitive. 

In 19th century science, it was held that air carried the voice and that in a theoretical vacuum there could be no conversations. As a corollary, it was believed (even before the time of Sir Isaac Newton) that the aether carried light waves as air carried sound. While the aether could not be proved, it was considered as a theory scientifically logical as a corollary to sound transmission via the air. Towards the end of the 19th century, experiments were performed by an interferometer by sending light waves in the direction the earth was alleged to be moving, vertically, and in reverse, to prove the earth's movement by measuring the resistance of the aether wind. These experiments demonstrated that there was no aether wind resistance, and using scientific logic thus there was no earth movement. It is important to point out that scientific logic and absolute proof are not the same. But, then, in almost all astronomy, there is no absolute proof. Dr. Einstein's contribution to this problem was to try to save appearances for atheism by saying there was no aether. 

Einstein believed in the God of Spinoza, who postulated that the universe and all the people in it were God, which represents such an irrational insanity that we can safely call them atheists. Think, dear reader, of all the bad things men do and then consider, as did Einstein and Spinoza, that this too is God. See Pierre Bayle's analysis of Spinoza in his Dictionaire historique et critique. 

The most important lesson that can be drawn from this discussion is that neither heliocentricity nor a-centricity can be absolutely proved by science, since they base their conclusions on unobserved phenomena. The Bible, therefore, has not been disproved, and so, all schools teaching Einstein, Galileo or Darwin are undermining God's infallible words with unproved teachings. It is by this rebelling against God that Christians have become prone to the Jewish degenerate doctrines and thus have been punished by God by the Jewish plague. God will end this perfidy, as He did in Germany, in His good time unless they repent. 

Let us pray, dear reader, that this translation of the 1890 Civilta 3-part series helps them along the path of true reform.

__________________________________

This discussion of The Jewish Question by the Jesuits in 1890, along with added notations in 2001, comprise a rare treatise with the most ominous portends. 

Notation in 2002: In reading this 1890 book which describes the workings of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Sion centuries before their private publication by Philip Stepanov in 1897, one must bear in mind several points: namely the "Jewish" roots of the perfidious Jesuits; God's Bible declares that earth is not "flat"; Hitler, the Roman Catholic illegitimate son of a Rothschild, had no plans to exterminate "Jews" like the "Jews" in their quest for world hegemony exterminated scores of millions of nominal Christians in Russia, China and elsewhere. And finally that these "Jews" are generally unrelated to Hebrews and Israelites by blood through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and certainly not by faith, but generally non-Semitic and the only anti-Semitic people on earth. Their activities prove that the enmity God set between the races of Cain and Adam is extant:   "All Israel shall be saved"all 144,000 elect but "All Israel is not Israel." jq2.htm