Friday, July 11, 2025

Pop Quiz. The Ten Commandments

 Mick wagers fewer than 20% of the next 200 Catholics you meet will be able to tell you what the Ten Commandments are.

Can the reader do it without looking them up?


I am the Lord thy God. Thou shall not have strange gods before Me.

Thou shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.

Remember to keep holy the Lord's day.

Honor thy father and mother.

Thou shall not kill.

Thou shall not commit adultery.

Thou shall not steal.

Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's wife.

Thou shall not covet thy neighbor's goods.


Thursday, July 10, 2025

Must a religion offer sacrifice to be considered a legitimate religion?

CARITATIS STUDIUM
ENCYCLICAL OF POPE LEO XIII
ON THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND

  

To Our Venerable Brethren, the Archbishops, and Bishops of Scotland.

Venerable Brethren, Health and Apostolic Blessing.

The ardent charity which renders Us solicitous of Our separated brethren, in nowise permits Us to cease Our efforts to bring back to the embrace of the Good Shepherd those whom manifold error causes to stand aloof from the one Fold of Christ. Day after day We deplore more deeply the unhappy lot of those who are deprived of the fullness of the Christian Faith. 

Wherefore moved by the sense of the responsibility which Our most sacred office entails, and by the spirit and grace of the most loving Saviour of men, Whom We unworthily represent, We are constantly imploring them to agree at last to restore together with Us the communion of the one and the same faith. A momentous work, and of all humanworks the most difficult to be accomplished; one which God's almighty poweralone can effect. But for this very reason We do not lose heart, nor are We deterred from Our purpose by the magnitude of the difficulties which cannot be overcome by human power alone. "We preach Christ crucified . . . and theweakness of God is stronger than men" (1 Cor. i. 23-25). 

In the midstof so many errors and of so many evils with which We are afflicted or  threatened, We continue to point out whence salvation should be sought,exhorting and admonishing all nations to lift up "their eyes to the mountains whence help shall come" (Ps. cxx.). For indeed that which Isaias spoke in prophecy has been fulfilled, and the Church of God stands forth so conspicuously by its Divine origin and authority that it can be distinguished by all beholders: "And in the last days the mountain of the house of the Lord shall be prepared on the top of mountains and shall be exalted above the hills" (Is. ii. 2).

2. Scotland, so dear to the Holy See, and in a special manner to Us, has its place in Our care and solicitude. We love to recall the fact that over twenty years ago the first act of Our Apostolic Ministry was performed in favour of Scotland, for on the second day of our Pontificate We gave back to the Scottish people their Ecclesiastical Hierarchy. From that day forward, with your efficient co-operation, Venerable Brethren, and that of your clergy, We have constantly sought to promote the welfare of your nation, which is naturally inclined to embrace the truth. And now that We are so far advanced in years that the end cannot be delayed much longer, We have thought it meet to address you,Venerable Brethren, and thus give your nation a further proof of Our Apostolic affection.

3. The terrible storm which swept over the Church in the sixteenth century, deprived the vast majority of the Scottish people, as well as many other peoples of Europe, of that Catholic Faith which they had gloriously held for over one thousand years. It is most pleasing to Us to revert to the great achievements of your forefathers on behalf of Catholicism, and also to allude to some of those ,and they are many, to whose virtue and illustrious deeds Scotland owes so much of her renown. Surely your fellow-countrymen will not take it ill that We should again remind them of what they owe to the Catholic Church and to the Apostolic See. We speak of what you already know. As your ancient Annals relate, St.Ninian, a countryman of yours, was so inflamed with the desire of greater spiritual progress by the reading of Holy Writ, that he exclaimed: "I shall rise and go over sea and land, seeking that truth which my soul loveth. But is so much trouble needful? Was it not said to Peter: `Thou are Peter and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it?' Therefore in the faith of Peter there is nothing wanting, nothing obscure, nothing imperfect, nothing against which evil doctrines and pernicious views can prevail, after the manner of the gates of hell. And where is the faith of Peter, but in the See of Peter? Thither, thither I must repair, that going forth frommy country, from my kindred, and from my father's house, I may see in the land of the Vision the will of the Lord and be protected by His Temple." (Ex Hist. Vitae S. Niniani a S. Aelredo Ab. cons.) 

Hence, full of reverence hehastened to Rome, and when at the Tomb of the Apostles he had imbibed in abundance Catholic truth at its very source and fountainhead, by command of theSupreme Pontiff he returned home, preached the true Roman faith to his fellow-countrymen, and founded the Church of Galloway about two hundred years before St. Augustine landed in England. This was the faith of St. Columba; this was the faith kept so religiously and preached so zealously by the monks of old, whose chief centre, Iona, was rendered famous by their eminent virtues. 

Need We mention Queen Margaret, a light and ornament not only of Scotland, but of the whole of Christendom, who, though she occupied the most exalted position in point of worldly dignity, sought only in her whole life things eternal and divine, and thus spread throughout the Church the luster of her virtues? There can be no doubt she owed this her eminent sanctity to the influence and guidance of the Catholic Faith. And did not the power and constancy of the Catholic faith give to Wallace and Bruce, the two great heroes of your race, their indomitable courage in defence of their country? 

We say nothing of the immense number of those who achieved so much for the commonwealth, and who belong to that progeny which the Catholic Church has never ceased to bring forth. We say nothing of the advantages which your nation has derived from her influence. It is undeniable that it was through her wisdom and authority that those famous seats of learning were opened at St. Andrews, Glasgow, and Aberdeen, and that your judicial system was drawn up and adopted. Hence We can well understand why Scotland has been honoured by the title of "Special Daughter of the Holy See."

4. But since then a great change has come to pass, the ancient faith having been extinguished in the minds of the vast majority of your countrymen. Are we to suppose that it will never be restored? There are indeed some signs which lead Us to hope that, by the grace of God, a brighter religious future awaits the Scotch people. We see that Catholics are more liberally and kindly dealt with as time goes on, that Catholic doctrines are no longer publicly held up to scorn, as perhaps was formerly the case, but on the contrary are favourably considered by many, and accepted by not a few. We also perceive that false views and opinions, which effectively prevent the perception of truth, are gradually disappearing. May the search after truth spread more, for there is no doubt that an accurate knowledge of the Catholic Religion, drawn from its own, and not from extraneous, sources, will clear away many prejudices.

5. Great praise is due to the Scottish nation, as a whole, that they have always shown reverence and love for the Inspired Writings. They cannot therefore be unwilling to listen to a few words which in Our affection We would address to them on this subject with a view to their eternal welfare; since We find that in revering the Sacred Scriptures, they are in agreement with the Catholic Church. Why then should this not be the starting-point for a return to unity? We beg them to remember that they have the Books of the Old Covenant and of the New from the Catholic Church and from the Catholic Church alone. If these Inspired Writings have passed unscathed through the many and dangerous vicissitudes of centuries, such a blessing is to be attributed to her never-failing vigilance and unceasing care. History attests that in the early ages of the Church the integrity of the Scriptures was preserved by the ever-memorable efforts of the Third Synod at Carthage and of Innocent I, the Roman Pontiff. 

At a later time no less watchfulness was shown, as we know, by Eugenius IV and by the Council of Trent. We Ourselves, not unmindful of the necessities of the present day,published a short while ago an Encyclical Letter in which We gravely addressed the Bishops of the Catholic world and diligently admonished them as to the means to be adopted in order to safeguard the integrity and the Divine authority of the Sacred Writings. For owing to the restlessness of modern thought, there are many whom the inordinate desire of superciliously inquiring into everything, and contempt for antiquity, pervert to such a degree, that they either refuse all authority to Holy Writ, or at least seriously curtail and minimize it. These men, puffed up by an exaggerated estimate of their own knowledge, and having an overweening trust in their own judgment, fail to perceive how rash and monstrousi t is to try to measure the works of God by our own puny intelligence; nor dot hey sufficiently heed St. Augustine's warning: "Honour God's Scripture, honour God's Word though not understood, reverently wait in order to understand" (in Ps. 146, n. 12). "Those who study the Venerable Scriptures ought to be admonished . . . that they must pray in order tocomprehend." (Doct. Chr. lib. iii., c. 37, n. 56.) "Lest anything unknown be rashly asserted as known . . . let nothing be rashly asserted, but all things cautiously and modestly examined" (in Gen. Op. Imp.).

6. But as the Church was to last to the end of time, something more was required besides the bestowal of the Sacred Scriptures. It was obviously necessary that the Divine Founder should take every precaution, lest the treasure of heavenly-given truths, possessed by the Church, should ever be destroyed, which would assuredly have happened, had He left those doctrines to each one's private judgment. It stands to reason, therefore, that a living, perpetual "magisterium" was necessary in the Church from the beginning, which, by the command of Christ himself, should besides teaching other wholesome doctrines, give an authoritative explanation of Holy Writ, and which being directed and safeguarded by Christ himself, could by no means commit itself to erroneous teaching. 

God has provided for these needs most wisely and effectively through His Only-begotten Son Jesus Christ, Who placed the true sense of the Scriptures in safety, when He laid upon HisApostles as His primary and most momentous injunction, not to devote themselves to writing, nor to spreading the volumes of the Old Testament indiscriminately and unguardedly among the multitude, but to teach all nations with the living voice, and to lead them by speech to the knowledge and profession of His Heavenly doctrine: "Going into the whole world preach the Gospel to every creature." (Mark xvi. 15.) 

But the supreme teaching authority was committed to one, on whom, as on its foundation, the Church must rest. For Christ when He gave the keys to Peter, gave him at the same time the power to govern those who were charged with the "ministry of the word:" "Confirm thyBrethren" (Luke xxii. 32). And since the faithful must learn from the"magisterium" of the Church whatever pertains to the salvation of their souls, it follows that they must also learn from it the true meaning ofScripture.

7. It is easy to perceive how unsafe, how inadequate, and how useless is the method propounded by those who think that the only way to interpret Scripture is by the help of Scripture itself. For on that principle the ultimate law of interpretation would rest with the individual judgment. But, as we have already stated, each one will undertake the reading of Scripture with entirely different feelings, views, and prepossessions, and will interpret God's written Word accordingly. The result will be that those divergent interpretations will necessarily produce discussions and disputes, and thus turn what was intended as a source of union and peace into a source of contention and strife.

8. The truth of what We have just stated is proven by what has actually taken place since, of all the sects, deprived as they are of the Catholic Faith and disagreeing among themselves on religious matters, each one claims that its own teaching and practices are in accord with HolyWrit. There is no gift of God so sacred, that man cannot abuse it to his own detriment; since, according to the stern warning of Blessed Peter, "the unlearned and unstable wrest" the very Scriptures "to their own destruction" (2 Peter iii., 16). 

Hence Irenaeus, who lived shortly after the Apostolic age, and who is a faithful interpreter of Apostolic doctrine, always taught that a knowledge of the truth could only be had from the living voice of the Church: "Where the Church is, there is the Spirit of God, and where the spirit of God is found, there is the Church and all grace, and the Spirit is truth" - (Adv. Haer. lib. iii.). "Where, therefore, the gifts of God are placed, it is necessary to learn the truth from those who have in the Church the Apostolic Succession"- (Adv. Haer. lib. iv.). And if Catholics, who may differ on all other matters, are found united in marvellous concord in the faith, there can be no doubt that this is chiefly owing to the authority and power of the "magisterium."

9. We know that many of the Scottish people, who do not agree with us in faith, sincerely love the name of Christ, and strive to ascertain His doctrine and to imitate His most holy example. But how can they obtain what they are striving for, if they do not allow themselves to be taught heavenly things in the way prescribed by Jesus Christ Himself; if they do not give heed to the Church whose precepts they are commanded to obey by the Author of faith as if they were His own: "He who heareth you heareth me; he who despiseth you despiseth me"; if they do not seek the nourishment of their souls, and the sustenance of all virtue, from him whom the Supreme Pastor of souls made His vicegerent, to whom He confided the care of the universal Church? In the meantime We are resolved not to fail in doing Our share, and especially to be constant in fervent prayer, that God may move their minds to what is good, and vouchsafe to impart to them the most powerful impulses of His grace. May the Divine clemency,thus earnestly implored by Us, grant to the Church that supreme consolation of speedily embracing the whole Scottish people, restored to the faith of theirf orefathers "in spirit and in truth." What incalculable blessings would not accrue to them, if they were once more united to us? 

Perfect and absolute truth would everywhere shine forth, together with the inestimable gifts which were forfeited by separation. There is one amongst all others, the loss of which is more deplorable than words can express; We allude to the most holy Sacrifice in which Jesus Christ, both Priest and Victim, daily offers Himself to His Father, through the ministry of His priests on earth. By virtue of this Sacrifice the infinite merits of Christ, gained by His Precious Blood shed once upon the Cross for the salvation of men, are applied to our souls. This belief prevailed among the Scottish people in St. Columba's day and in subsequent ages, when your grand and majestic cathedrals were raised throughout the land, which still testify to the art and piety of your ancestors.

10. Now the very essence of Religion implies Sacrifice. For the perfection of Divine Worship is found in the submissive and reverent acknowledgment that God is the Supreme Lord of all things, by Whose power we and all our belongings exist. This constitutes the very nature of Sacrifice, which, on this account, is emphatically called a "thing Divine." If Sacrifices are abolished,Religion can neither exist nor be conceived. The Evangelical Law is not inferior, but superior, to the Old Law. It brings to perfection what the Old Law had merely begun. But the Sacrifice of the Cross was prefigured by the sacrifices of the Old Covenant long before the Birth of Jesus Christ; and after His Ascension, the same Sacrifice is continued by the Eucharistic Sacrifice.They greatly err, therefore, who reject this doctrine, as if it diminished the reality and efficacy of the Sacrifice which Christ offered on the Cross. He"was offered once to exhaust the sins of many" (Heb. ix., 28). That atonement for the sins of men was absolutely complete: nor is there any other atonement besides that of the Cross in the Eucharistic Sacrifice. As Religion must ever be accompanied by a sacrificial rite, it was the Divine counsel of the Redeemer that the Sacrifice of the Cross should be perpetuated. This perpetuity is in the most Holy Eucharist, which is not an empty similitude or a mere commemoration, but the very Sacrifice flows from the death of Christ: "For from the rising of the sun even to the going down, my name is great among theGentiles, and in every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to my name a clean oblation: for my name is great among the Gentiles" (Mal. i. 2).

11. It remains for Us now to address the Catholics in a more special manner, and We do so in order that they should co-operate with Us in realizing what We have at heart. Christian charity bids each one labour, according to his opportunities, for the salvation of his fellowmen. We therefore call upon them first of all constantly to offer prayers and supplications to God, Who alone can give the necessary light to the minds of men, and dispose their wills as He pleases.

 And furthermore, as example is most powerful, let them show themselves worthy of the truth which through Divine mercy they possess, and let them recommend the faith which they hold by edifying and stainless lives. "So let your light shine before men, that they may seeyour good works" (Matth. v., 16). Let them at the same time distinguish themselves by the practice of virtue in public life, so that it should be more and more clearly shown that Catholicism cannot be said, without calumny, to run counter to the interests of the State: but that, on the contrary, nothing else contributes so much to the honourable and successful discharge of social duties.

12. It is likewise of vital importance to defend most strenuously, to establish more firmly, and to surround with every safeguard, the Catholic education of youth. We are not unmindful of the fact that in Scotland thoroughly efficient schools exist, in which the best method of teaching is to be found. But every effort must be put forth, and every sacrifice must be made, so that Catholic schools should be second to none in point of efficiency. We must not allow our youth to be inferior to others in literary attainments, or in learning, which the Christian faith demands as its honourable accompaniments with a view to its defence and adornment. The love of Religion and country requires that whatever institutions Catholics already possess for the purposes of primary, intermediate, or higher education, should, by the due and proportionate cooperation of all, be consolidated and extended. 

Justice similarly demands that the education and training of the clergy should be most zealously promoted, as they cannot now-a-days occupy worthily and usefully their position, unless they have the prestige of wide erudition and solid learning. In this connection, We can find no institution more worthy of being recommended than Blahs College. An excellent and noble work, begun with exceptional zeal and generosity by one devoted Catholic, this institution should not be allowed to decline and disappear by neglect, but should be sustained by a similar charity, and completed as soon as possible. This will be tantamount to making provision that for nearly the whole of Scotland, priests will be trained and educated according to the needs of the present time.

13. All these things, Venerable Brethren, which Our affection for the Scottish people has suggested to Us, we commend to your thoughtfulness and charity. Continue to exercise that zeal of which you have given Us such abundant proof, so that everything may be effected which may conduce to the realization of what we have in view. The matter in hand is extremely difficult, and one the accomplishment of which, as We have repeatedly stated, surpasses all human efforts; but it is most holy and desirable, and in perfect harmony with the counsels of Divine Goodness. Wherefore, We are not so much deterred by the difficulties, as We are encouraged by the conviction that the Divine help will not fail, if you devote yourselves to the fulfilment of these Our wishes and behests.

14. As a pledge of Divine grace, and as a token of Our fatherly affection, Welovingly impart to you, in the Lord, Venerable brethren, to your clergy andpeople our Apostolic Blessing.

Given at St. Peter's, Rome, the 25th day of July, in the year 1898, and the twenty-first of Our Pontificate.

LEO XIII

 


Wednesday, July 9, 2025

Who was Jesus acrrd to Orthodox Jews, Judeo-what?

 


Who Was Jesus?

The Bible gave a warning about a dangerous, false prophet who would arise to test our faith in G-d. In Deuteronomy 13, G-d describes this false prophet as a member of the Jewish people (v. 2, 7) who would tell true prophecies and would have the power of miracles. G-d Himself would give this false prophet the power to perform miracles and reveal prophecy, but the false prophet would try to seduce the people away from G-d's Law and towards strange gods unknown to Judaism. The purpose would be to test whether we are truly committed to living under the Law, or whether we will be dazzled and fall for the temptation to join a false path to salvation (v. 3-6, 7-8, 11). In this Biblical passage, G-d repeatedly commands the Jews to kill this false prophet, lest the evil spread and destroy many souls.

To be accepted by the people, the false prophet would sometimes pretend to be a righteous Jew who fulfills the Law, but at key moments he would turn against certain details of the Law in order to make the breach (v. 6, 7). This is the reason that verse 1 commands us not to add or subtract any details from the Law, and verse 5 warns us to remain steadfast with all the traditions of the Law.

In Deuteronomy 17, this false prophet is also described as someone who would rebel against the authority of the judges of the Jewish people, and who should be put to death for his rebelliousness (v. 8-13, esp. v. 12). Who are the judges? The highest court in Israel was the Sanhedrin, which was established by Moses (Exodus 18:13-26; Numbers 11:16-29), and which lasted more than 15 centuries. The members of the Sanhedrin were the rabbis known as "Pharisees" (Pirushim, "those with the explanation"). G-d gave permanent authority to these judges to interpret the Law and G-d's Word, and it is a commandment to follow their decisions without turning even slightly to the right or the left (Deut. 17:11). But the false prophet would challenge the authority of the Sanhedrin, thus revealing himself to be an evil man.

In the book of the prophet Daniel, this false prophet is described as a king (the eleventh horn on a terrible beast) who would wage war against the Jews (the "holy ones"; see Deut. 14:2 on this term) and would change the Law including the calendar and the holidays (Daniel 7:8, 20-25). Elsewhere, this false prophet is described as a king who would disregard the G-d of his fathers, exalting himself as a god and giving honor to this new god-head (Daniel 11:36-39).

The man known today as "Jesus" fulfilled all these prophecies. He became a "king" (over the Christian church) who changed the original Law, doing away with the Hebrew calendar and the Biblical holidays (Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Sukkos the Festival of Tabernacles, Passover, etc.). He disregarded the one, infinite G-d of the Hebrew Bible in favor of a new "trinity" that included himself. And he repeatedly broke the Law by committing terrible sins, while openly challenging the G-d-given authority of the rabbis of the Sanhedrin.

Naturally, Jesus did sometimes pretend to respect the Law, but whenever he thought he could get away with it, he turned right around and broke that same Law. In Matthew 5:17-19, he declared that he came to fulfill the Law, and in Matthew 23:1-3 he defended the authority of the rabbis. But the rest of the time, he rebelled against the Law—thus showing that his occasional words of piety were meant only to hide his evil agenda. The following sins of Jesus are recorded in the "New Testament":

  1. Jesus repudiated the laws of kosher food (Mark 7:18-19). [Compare this to the prophet Daniel's strict adherence to kashrus, in Daniel chapter 1.]
  2. He repudiated the laws of honoring one's parents, and called on his followers to hate their parents; he also dishonored his own mother (Matthew 10:34-36; Matthew 12:46-50; Luke 14:26).
  3. He violated the Sabbath by picking grain, and incited his disciples to do the same (Matthew 12:1-8; Mark 2:23-26).
  4. 4) He again violated the Sabbath by healing a man's arm, which was not a matter of saving a life, and he openly defied the rabbis in his total repudiation of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:9-13; Mark 3:1-5). [Compare this to G-d's view of violating the Sabbath, in Numbers 15:32-36, Nehemiah 10:30-32, and dozens of other places throughout the Bible.]
  5. Jesus brazenly defied and disobeyed the rabbis of the Sanhedrin, repudiating their authority (This is recorded in many places throughout the New Testament, but look especially at Matthew 23:13-39 and John 8:44-45).

The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of "Jesus the Nazarene":

  1. He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).
  2. He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).
  3. He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh—which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).

The false, rebellious message of Jesus has been thoroughly rejected by the vast majority of the Jewish people, as G-d commanded. Unfortunately, however, this same message has brought a terrible darkness upon the world; today, over 1.5 billion gentiles believe in Jesus. These lost souls mistakenly think they have found salvation in Jesus; tragically, they are in for a rude awakening. Truth and eternal life are found directly from G-d, through performing His Law. Any "mediator" only separates man from G-d:

  1. "G-d is not a man, who can lie, nor the son of man, who relents... He has not beheld iniquity in Jacob, nor has He seen perverseness in Israel" (Numbers 23:19).
  2. Speaking prophetically of the Christian church, Moses declared, "For their 'rock' is not like our Rock... Where is their god, in whom they trusted?" (Deut. 32:31, 37).
  3. "'See now that I, only I, am He, and there is no god with Me. I kill, and I bring to life; I wound, and I heal, and there is none who can rescue from My Hand...' Sing songs of joy, gentiles, with His people, for He will avenge the blood of His servants, and will take vengeance on His enemies, and will forgive His land and His people" (Deut. 32:39, 43).
  4. "I, only I am Hashem (the L-rd), and besides Me there is no savior" (Isaiah 43:11).
  5. "I am the First and I am the Last; besides me there is no god... Is there a god besides Me? There is no rock; I do not know any" (Isaiah 44:6).
  6. "Israel is saved in Hashem with an eternal salvation... Assemble yourselves and come, come near together, you gentiles who have escaped [the judgment]. (They have no knowledge, those who carry wooden sculptures and who pray to a god that does not save.) Announce and bring near, even take counsel together: Who declared this from ancient times, and announced it from then? Is it not I, Hashem? And there are no other gods beside Me, nor any righteous and saving god other than Me. Turn to Me and be saved, all ends of the earth, for I am G-d and there is none else. By Myself I swore, a righteous word went out of my mouth and it will not be withdrawn, that to Me every knee will bow and every tongue will swear" (Isaiah 45:17, 20-23).

What is the true key to salvation? Those who return to the Law (the Seven Commandments for the Children of Noah, according to the eternal covenant made with Noah in Genesis 9) and who assist the Jewish people (Isaiah 60, 61, 66) will be saved and will participate in the miracles and revelations, including worshipping in the Third Temple, under the kingship of the Messiah. As described in many places, including Jeremiah 16:19-21 and Zechariah 8:20-23, all the old gentile religions of the world will disappear, and their followers will turn to the Jews for spiritual leadership. Until then, Christians are spiritually blinded, and cannot yet understand G-d's wisdom in the Bible.

Ours is the last generation of the era of sin and evil and the first of the Messianic Era. Indeed, for the first time in history, there is a growing consensus of leading rabbis willing to name the man most suited to be the Messiah, and they are agreeing that he is the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. The Rebbe is the spiritual leader of our generation, having boldly stirred up controversy over vital issues in which other leaders have remained tragically silent or have even caved in to the growing forces of darkness. He has upheld the Law perfectly and has worked mightily to strengthen the observance of the Law by Jews, as well as the observance of the Noachide Law by gentiles. Through his teaching of chasidus (Jewish mystical teachings, preserved from Moses and Mount Sinai), he has taught the world that G-d is One, the Infinite Who renews creation at every moment. The Rebbe is a direct descendant of King David and has received a true prophecy from G-d that we who are alive in this generation shall be the first in history to see the coming of the true messiah. Many Jews are eagerly anticipating the Rebbe's resurrection from the grave, ready to re-establish the Sanhedrin and anoint the king.

Our job is to finish preparing the way, by announcing the truth and bringing all of mankind back to the Law immediately. Through our divinely mandated efforts, we shall now clear the path for the return of the Garden of Eden and the establishment of the eternal sinless world promised by Isaiah and the other Biblical prophets.


The insane Rabbi, riven with hatred, whom the Jews thought was the Messias;

https://tinyurl.com/5cru8tyh

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

This new way of being church. Can it actually supplant the Hierarchical Church Jesus established?

 No; not on the level of reality but in the mind of Popes Francis and Leo XIV?

Yes.

The change is being implemented and what can a faithful Catholic man do?

Keep the Faith once delivered; act manfully and wait on The Lord.

Read it and weep Catholics; these revolutionaries are not only coming for your Church; they already control it.

Francis’s Critics, Vatican II, and the Theology of the People

For all the accusations of doctrinal confusion—and even hints of heresy—it’s important to remember that Pope Francis’s magisterium was firmly rooted in the Second Vatican Council, and more specifically in its distinctly Argentine reception, known as the theology of the People. This theological current was developed by the theological experts or periti of the Episcopal Commission of Pastoral Ministry (COEPAL, by its Spanish acronym), a synodal task force of bishops, priests, and lay advisors convened by the Argentine bishops’ conference in the wake of Vatican II. Its purpose was to implement the Council’s conclusions in the Argentine context. COEPAL’s most influential periti were two diocesan priests, Lucio Gera and Rafael Tello—arguably the most important Argentine theologians of the 20th century.

At the time, Jorge Mario Bergoglio was still completing his formation as a Jesuit and had little direct contact with COEPAL. But years later—especially after becoming auxiliary bishop and later archbishop of Buenos Aires in the 1990s—he fully embraced this theological tradition. More than any other influence, it shaped both his pastoral approach and theological worldview. As pope, his closest theological advisors came from this school: Fr. Carlos Galli, a disciple of Gera and a member of the International Theological Commission, and Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith. Their collaboration with Francis dates back to 2007, when then-Archbishop Bergoglio led the commission drafting the final document of the Fifth Latin American Episcopal Conference in Aparecida, Brazil. Galli and Fernández authored the final draft and would go on to contribute to all major documents of Francis’s pontificate.

Interestingly, the architects of the theology of the People never used that name. They called it “popular pastoral theology.” Its core concepts were summarized in a 1974 book titled ¿Qué es la pastoral popular? (“What Is Popular Pastoral Theology?”), published one year after COEPAL was disbanded. While attributed to Jesuit Fernando Boasso, the book is really a synthesis of years of conversations among COEPAL’s team of theologians and religious sociologists in Buenos Aires from 1968 to 1973. These discussions built upon their reading of Vatican II documents—especially Lumen Gentium and Gaudium et Spes. The two central concepts of popular pastoral theology—“people” and “popular culture”—emerged directly from these two conciliar texts.

Prior to Vatican II, the dominant image of the Church was a hierarchical structure in which clerics—by virtue of their ordination—occupied a superior role to the laity. At the top stood the pope, and the Church was governed according to what became known as the “Roman model,” formalized during the papacy of Pius IX. This clericalist vision understood the Church as a strict chain of command, with the pope as absolute monarch. Many integralist Catholics sought to extend this authoritarian model to civil society as well, treating it as a bulwark of order and stability.


(This is the Monarchial Structure of the Catholic Church as established by Jesus Christ.  It is apparent that Francis and Leo IV reject what Jesus Christ established and they are weaponising a suspect and socialist summary of this pastoral council in direct contradiction to the infallible teaching of Vatican 1 on the Church - read and reread this frequently because the Catholic Church established by Jesus Christ is trying to be stolen from you by those with absolutely no authority to do any such thing

https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum20.htm


Lumen Gentium replaced this vertical image with a more horizontal one: the Church as the People of God, composed of all the baptized—clergy and laity alike. This shift was symbolically reinforced in the document itself, where the chapter on the People of God precedes the chapter on the hierarchical structure of the Church. While this did not change the canonical role of bishops as successors to the apostles (a point contested by some radical reformers in the postconciliar era), it did challenge the clericalist model. When Pope Francis decried clericalism as a distortion of the Church, he was simply reiterating the vision of Vatican II.

Gaudium et Spes, for its part, recognized the legitimate autonomy of the secular world and encouraged Christians to engage with it, rather than attempt to impose their beliefs, as had often been the case in preconciliar days. The document adopted the “see, judge, act” method of the Young Christian Workers movement and called on Catholics to read the signs of the times and work to transform society in light of the Gospel.


(Tradition has always taught there are three enemies of the Catholic Faithful; The world, the flesh and the devil; in that order.  When claims are made that Vatican Two recognized the world as a legitimate autonomy, why did it not warn it remains an enemy of the Catholic Church and its faithful members?)

COEPAL’s periti rooted these teachings in the particularities of Argentine life, especially the experiences of the poor and working class. Years before “the preferential option for the poor” became a global catchphrase, these theologians saw the Church’s mission as one of solidarity with the marginalized. Many of them had served as chaplains to the Argentine Young Christian Workers in the 1950s and were shaped by its pastoral obrera (worker pastoral ministry), a direct antecedent to the theology of the People.

This historical setting also helps explain the movement’s relationship with Peronism, the populist political movement founded by Juan Domingo Perón in the 1940s. For decades, Argentina’s working class has overwhelmingly identified with Peronism. Pastoral closeness to the working class inevitably meant engagement with their political loyalties, despite Peronism’s authoritarian tendencies. After a military coup deposed Perón in 1955—with the support of many middle- and upper-class Catholics—his movement was banned for nearly two decades. In the 1960s, another military dictatorship ruled the country, and the struggle to lift the ban on Peronism became intertwined with the broader movement for the return of democracy. The periti’s theology reflected this environment: they denounced U.S. imperialism and Argentina’s economic dependency as structural causes of poverty. At the same time, their embrace of a national-populist ideology was also a conscious alternative to the Marxist ideologies that drew in many progressive Catholics during this era, including some who joined guerrilla movements inspired by the Cuban Revolution.

The theology of the People has often been labeled the Argentine version of liberation theology. But that’s a mischaracterization. In fact, during the 1980s, when John Paul II launched a crackdown on liberation theology, the theology of the People—then often referred to as a theology of culture—was seen in Rome as a preferable alternative. (Call me skeptical but where is source link to substantiate this claim?)the Many progressive Catholics dismissed it as regressive, largely because of its embrace of popular piety, which they viewed as complicit in the structures of oppression. By contrast, the theology of the People interpreted popular Catholicism as a genuine expression of the sensus fidei, the Spirit-given intuition of faith that lives in the people, especially the poor. Bergoglio’s reputation as a “conservative” stemmed in large part from his defense of this view. (Sensus Fidei means ALL of the faithful, not just the poor)

The collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of revolutionary utopias softened this rift between Latin America’s theological currents. Over time, both branches turned their attention to shared priorities—especially concern for the poor. The cordial exchange between Francis and Leonardo Boff at the beginning of Francis’s pontificate symbolized this convergence.

Two other areas of Francis’s magisterium that drew intense criticism were also deeply rooted in Vatican II. In Traditionis Custodes, Francis upheld the liturgical vision of Sacrosanctum Concilium against those nostalgic for the Tridentine Mass. (It was revealed by the Catholic Journalist, Diane Montagna, that this was a lie

https://dianemontagna.substack.com/p/exclusive-official-vatican-report.       )


 Likewise, his pastoral outreach to divorced and remarried Catholics, as well as LGBTQ Catholics, stems from both the Council’s pastoral orientation and its emphasis on human dignity, moral discernment, and the centrality of love and mercy.

Ultimately, opposition to Pope Francis’s teachings often amounts to a rejection of Vatican II itself—sometimes overtly, sometimes cloaked in calls for a “correct” interpretation of the Council. In Benedict XVI’s famous distinction between a hermeneutic of continuity and one of rupture, Francis clearly embodied the reforming continuity the Council envisioned, shaped by his own experience in the “existential peripheries” of Buenos Aires and a deep awareness of the “throwaway culture” spreading through Latin America and the Global South.

By electing Cardinal Robert Prevost as Pope Leo XIV, the conclave affirmed the direction set by Francis over the past twelve years. And in his early actions and statements, Pope Leo has made it clear that he intends to continue that trajectory—especially with respect to synodality and popular piety. At the same time, some of his early gestures appear to extend an olive branch to more traditionalist Catholics. Time will tell whether that will be enough to appease Francis’s critics, or if the resistance to Vatican II will persist—and perhaps even grow—under Leo’s pontificate.


https://bigmodernism.substack.com/p/catholics-are-you-ready-for-your?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=4940692&post_id=167778475&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=bt7ac&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email


Monday, July 7, 2025

Long John Baldry

 A long time ago in the early 1970s,  Ol Mick lived in Portland, Maine & there was  a local station, WBLM, that produced a show, after midnight.


One night I was stoned and the host Mark Persky put this strange song on.


Back then one could not buy such a record locally because such a song was not being produced in America but man o man did I search all over Hell and half of Georgia looking for it.


It took me over a decade to find the album that included this song


The time of day, my state of being, the unusual song so unlike anything being produced at that time in America, made the night seem magical





Friday, July 4, 2025

Americana #1. Coincidence or Conspiracy?

 


I think many readers have either watched or heard about the once popular TV Show, "All in the Family.

One of the stars of the show was a woman named Sally Struthers 


She played, Gloria Stivic, wife of Meathead Mike, and she was the daughter of Archie Bunker.

Her acting ability consisted almost entirely of wailing like a Wiccan.


Oncet, the creator of the show, Norman Lear, became deathly ill when the bleach from his 'at seeped into his brain and it blowed up on him and he upped and died and the Synagogue cried and women of the Synagogue, named Naomi, Ruth and Esther, baked hundreds of Shiva Briskets but Sally Struthers was never invited because she believed in God and preferred  funeral potatoes.

Ostracised, from the Show's Cast and Synagogue, she became sullen and decided to go into the commercial racket and she began to pack on the pounds and she became a buxom bohunk bellyaching about starving kids (talk about irony).


When that gig rapidly went south Sally thought to her own self: Dang, my career is in the shitter. Lear has jetted oft to hell so there is no possibility of an All in The Family Part Deux so imma really start hitting the  Chocolate Fountain at The Golden Corral and try to look more like Dub Taylor and then maybe I can get hired on Gunsmoke or something.

Did it work? You decide:








Conspiracy or Coincidence?

Verdict? Conspiracy.









Thursday, July 3, 2025

America Taxes Christians and gives their money to the Rabbis

 As Christian American tax payer I think I speak for all of us when I thank the Orthodox rabbis through whose diligence I can be sure my spaghetti noodles are kosher.


Sure, my food costs more than it otherwise would but paying more for my food is worth it if it helps Orthodox Jews become wealthier, 


And what do I care if the slaughtering of beef must be done in such a way that the Rabbis won't be irked; sure, its the worst possible and most painful way to kill them but if the Rabbis are happier and wealthier, then its all good because Jews are a minority and, thus, have the right to regulate what I can and cannot eat, say and think.



https://www.islam-radio.net/judaism/kosher.htm