Noahide Laws are Talmudic. Am I to be subjected to the rule of the AntiChristian Talmud?

 https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9679-laws-noachian

https://web.archive.org/web/20120103145424/http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2011/12/deepening-judeo-spremacistnoahide.html

https://mauricepinayblog.wordpress.com/category/noahide-laws/page/2/

https://stopnoahidelaw.blogspot.com/2017/

https://www.abovethefirmament.com/post/the-noahide-laws

https://gazetawarszawska.com/index.php/historia-2/3001-the-jerusalem-sanhedrin-prepares-to-enforce-the-noahide-laws-2

On Dominus Iesus and the Jews

Dr. David Berger

Rabbinical Council of America

[Delivered at the 17th meeting of the International Catholic-Jewish Liaison Committee, New York, May 1, 2001.]

….The cardinal theological sin in Judaism is avodah zarah, literally "foreign worship." I became embroiled in a controversy several years ago when I carelessly used the usual translation "idolatry," which is in fact sloppy and misleading in our context. Properly understood, avodah zarah is the formal recognition or worship as God of an entity that is in fact not God. For Jews, the worship of Jesus of Nazareth as God incarnate falls within this definition. Because of the monotheistic, non-pagan character of Christianity, many Jewish authorities denied that worship of Jesus is sinful for non-Jews, though many others did not endorse this exemption. Now, let us assume that I respect the Christian religion, as I do. Let us assume further that I respect believing Christians, as I do, for qualities that emerge precisely out of their Christian faith. But I believe that the worship of Jesus as God is a serious religious error displeasing to God even if the worshipper is a non-Jew, and that at the end of days Christians will come to recognize this. Is this belief immoral? Does it disqualify me as a participant in dialogue? Does it entitle a Christian to denounce me for adhering to a teaching of contempt? I hope the answer to these questions is "no." If it is "yes," then interfaith dialogue is destructive of traditional Judaism and must be abandoned forthwith. We would face a remarkable paradox. Precisely because of its striving for interfaith respect and understanding, dialogue would become an instrument of religious imperialism.

Because of the relative political weakness of The Jews, The Rabbi can not definitely say us Catholics are not idolaters and, thus, not culpable for idolatry and, thus, not subject to the death penalty were some Sanhedrin Court to find us guilty.

Imagine some Christian (and by Christian I mean Catholic) publicly confessing - Well, I think we all know some Priests still think Jews are the servants of Satan * and are striving to destroy christian society and, thus, must be returned to their ghettoes to protect them from violence but, most importantly, to protect decent society from being destroyed by their malign and mendacious machinations.

1 Thess 2: For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own countrymen, even as they have from the Jews,  Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;

Apocalypse 2: I know thy tribulation and thy poverty, but thou art rich: and thou art blasphemed by them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.