By Richard Hooper BBC World Service 17 October 2013
… “There is a belief in my country that hyenas can see everything including the evil spirits people think cause mental illness,” says Hab. “So in Mogadishu, you will find hyenas that have been brought from the bush and families will pay £350 ($560) to have their loved one locked in the room overnight with the animal.”
The expensive treatment – more than the average annual wage – is as brutal as it sounds. By clawing and biting at the patient, the hyena is thought to force the evil spirit out. Patients, including young children, have been known to die during the process. …
WHO estimates that one in three Somalis either is or has been affected by mental illness, compared to a global average of one in 10. In parts of the country, where the population has been the most psychologically scarred from decades of conflict, the rate is even higher. Cases of post-traumatic stress disorder are common and the situation is further complicated by widespread substance abuse.
“Khat is a big, big problem,” says Hab of the herbal stimulant which has been chewed for centuries in East Africa. Side effects are thought to include anxiety and even psychosis. “We treat them in the hospital and they leave, but then they start eating khat again. Sometimes I see the same patients seven or eight times.” On the other hand, there are sensible medical experts whom I would challenge PBS to interview on a prime time special:
That is how the media trumped Trump and aided Clinton. When one is the apotheosis of vanity, such a program of opposition is easy to erect and sustain.
Can. 1373 A person who publicly incites his or her subjects to hatred or animosity against the Apostolic See or the Ordinary because of some act of ecclesiastical authority or ministry, or who provokes the subjects to disobedience against them, is to be punished by interdict or other just penalties.
The revolution destroyed the prayers of Consecration within The Canon and replaced it with these prayers
EP I
EP II
EP III
EP IV
The day before he suffered he took break in his sacred hands and looking up to heaven, to you, his almighty Father, he gave you thanks and praise. He broke the bread, gave it to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and eat it: this is my body which will be given up for you. When supper was ended, he took the cup. Again he gave you thanks and praise, gave the cup to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and drink from it: this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this in memory of me.
Before he was given up to death, a death he freely accepted, he took bread and gave you thanks, He broke the bread, gave it to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and eat it; this is my body which will be given up for you. When the supper was ended, he took the cup. Again he gave you thanks and praise, gave the cup to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and drink from it; this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this in memory of me.
On the night he was betrayed, he took bread and gave you thanks and praise. He broke the bread, gave it to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and eat it: this is my body which will be given up for you. When supper was ended, he took the cup. Again he gave you thanks and praise, gave the cup to his disciples, and said: Take this, all of you, and drink from it: this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this in memory of me.
He always loved those who were his own in the world. When the time came for him to be glorified by you, his heavenly Father, he showed the depth of his love. While they were at supper, he took bread, said the blessing, broke the bread, and gave it to his disciples, saying: Take this, all of you, and eat it: this is my body which will be given up for you. In the same way, he took the cup, filled with wine. He gave you thanks, and giving the cup to his disciples, said: Take this, all of you, and drink from it: this is the cup of my blood, the blood of the new and everlasting covenant. It will be shed for you and for all so that sins may be forgiven. Do this in memory of me.
In a puissant presentation within his book, The Ecumenical Vatican Council II, a much needed discussion, the Thomist, Brunero Gherardini, lamented the poor translation from the original Greek, the language in which the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass was first offered: Unfortunately, I have not had the joy of seeing any consideration of my objections to the meaning of Latin tradere which, in the original Greek (especially in the passive an reflexive forms), means "to be sacrificed" ]or "to give oneself in sacrifice," and the is based on a vast, classical documentation. During a meeting during the 80s I presented the fact that the phrase, "in qua note traebatur" in 1 Col 11: 23 and in the Eucharistic Prayer III must not be translated "on the night He was betrayed," but "on the night in which He sacrificed Himself, consigned Himself to death, or was sacrificed." One of the reverend Fathers (recently deceased) respond to me with angelic sweetness, "Even if the sense is literally as you say, pro bono animarum we have chosen to "on the night in which He was betrayed." Stupendous: for the benefit of souls we have a gross error which is not also, but nigro ver rubro signandus lapillo. "For the good of souls" (pro bono animarum) the revolutionaries lied to us. Just think about that for awhile, let it sink in. In the meantime, if you can find one, assist at the Divine Liturgy of St John Chrysostom (I go to St Nicholas in Delray, Florida) where you can hear the prayer unveiled by intentional mistranslations for the good of our souls.
Truth be told, I prefer the Melkite Mass over even the old Latin Mass and Saint Nicholas is an absolutely beautiful church with a serious solemn and beautiful Liturgy.
Muckle onto this crummy table and rip it out from in front of the Altar in the sanctuary of the Cathedral of Notre Dame and toss the damn table into the Seine and then rededicate the High Altar (An Altar represents Jesus Christ) and drop the guillotine on the revolutionary Pauline Rite and restore the Real Mass of Tradition to its right place for that is how Jesus desires to be worshipped. That is the first necessary step to initiate the restoration of France.
After decades of Mahometan immigration London, England now has a Mahometan Mayor and as a country and culture it is standing directly above a trap door about to be sprung and then England will drop, swing, and then twist slowly in the silencing winds of Sharia.
But before that happens, as a last gasp, Jolly Ol' England begins to erect the police state that is the last step prior to Submission to Sharia Law and Dhimmitude.
Owing to liberalism and its highest principle, Non-Discrimination, England has chosen death over its own people, culture, and history.
I visited England with The Bride about a year ago and near an entrance to Westminster Abbey, a dour cop eyed the crowd with his fingers close to the trigger of a machine gun. Dear England...
You're my buddy, my pal, my friend It will be that way until the end
and wherever you go, I want you to know You're my buddy, my pal, my friend
Lets 's say your wife discovers you are an adulterer; Damn you, you bastard!! How could you, and with my best friend... Don't admit it and don't try to offer an excuse. Just look at her sweetly, smile, pick up a guitar, and start strumming while singing softly You're my buddy, my pal, my friend It will be that way until the end and wherever you go, I want you to know You're my buddy, my pal, my friend and before you know it, the questions about adultery will disappear behind a long Aaaaah, honey, that is so sweet. It reminds me of our first dog, Pookie. I miss her SO much and I love you. Let's say you had a dozen or so pints of Guinness at an Irish Pub while watching the Democratic National Convention (you HAVE to be drunk to listen to their shite) and a cop stops you on your way home just because you side-swiped a Hearse parked out behind a Funeral home (look, you had to stop and pee because there is no way you could make it home without stopping to take a leak). When the Cop asks for your driver's License and Registration, just reach into the back seat, grab your guitar, smile, say, This one's for you, officer, because you help keep our town safe: and start softly singing: You're my buddy, my pal, my friend It will be that way until the end and wherever you go, I want you to know You're my buddy, my pal, my friend And I guarantee you, the Cop will let you off with a warning as he stifles his weeping and tries to blink away his tears: Damn, man. that song reminds me of a dog we had when I was a kid, a dog named, Rudy Tootie Double Duty. My old man came home one night really hammered and run over her and kilt her dead - ded - dead.
You go on now- straight home and drive carefully..
Moroccan boxer, 22, is arrested after 'attempting to rape two chambermaids in the OLYMPIC VILLAGE' in Brazil
The Moroccan boxer Hassan Saada was detained by police this morning
He was arrested on suspicion of attempting to rape two chaimbermaids
The 22-year-old athlete will miss out on competing in the games
Hassan Saada was detained by police this morning over claims he attempted to sexually assault the two women in the athletes' accommodation at Barra de Tijuca. (Bar serving Tequila)
The 22-year-old athlete will miss out of competing in the games following allegations that he sexually assaulted two Brazilian domestic maids at the Olympic Village.
Hassan Saada was detained by police this morning over claims he attempted to sexually assault the two women in the athletes' accommodation at Barra de Tijuca
Saada, a light heavyweight boxer, was taken to a police station close the Olympic Stadium where he was stripped of his Olympic competitor status.
Detective Caroline Solomon of Recreio Police confirmed the athlete has been stripped of his credentials...
Investigating judge Larissa Nunes Saly has ruled the athlete will be held in custody for 15 days while police investigate the allegations against him.
According to Rio Police Saada is accused of attacking the two maids on Tuesday morning.
Police say he invited one of the women to pose for a selfie with him and he asked her if she had a profile on social media.
Then he pushed the woman up against the wall and tried to kiss her, it is claimed.
He is also accused of sexually assaulting the second woman by groping her breasts and made sexually-graphic gestures towards the maid and offered her money to perform a sex act upon him.
This is yet another act of religious discrimination on the part of a western Sharia-less State.
Poor Hassan was simply actualising his masculine prerogatives as a Mahometan and the women he was trying to take advantage of were not only kafirs, they were women he possessed by his right hand:
Koran 23:1-6—The Believers must (eventually) win through—those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess—for (in their case) they are free from blame.
Koran 70:22-30—Not so those devoted to Prayer—those who remain steadfast to their prayer; and those in whose wealth is a recognized right for the (needy) who asks and him who is prevented (for some reason from asking); and those who hold to the truth of the Day Of Judgement; and those who fear the displeasure of their Lord—for their Lord’s displeasure is the opposite of Peace and Tranquility—and those who guard their chastity, except with their wives and the (captives) whom their right hands possess—for (then) they are not to be blamed. The arrest and imprisonment of poor Hassan is a dark day for religious liberty and the fact that it was a female detective and a female judge that visited upon him this unjustified discriminatory action only makes matters worse. Look at this photo of a chambermaid and then try and tell me that her uniform and smile is not body language clearly expressing a desire to be raped:
Allah hath taught poor Hassan that he could have his way with these Chambermaids Koran [4.19] O you who believe! it is not lawful for you that you should take women as heritage against (their) will, and do not straiten them in order that you may take part of what you have given them, unless they are guilty of manifest indecency,and treat them kindly; then if you hate them, it may be that you dislike a thing while Allah has placed abundant good in it. Hassan must be judged by a jury of his Mahometan peers and found innocent of all charges if we in the west are going to continue bragging about our justice system.
Preserving Western Civilization Conference Baltimore, Maryland
February 8, 2009
To deal with the crisis facing our civilization, we must be both realistic and imaginative.
The realism part consists in recognizing how bad our situation is. The entire Western world is at present under the grip of the modern liberal ideology that targets every normal and familiar aspect of human life, and our entire historical way of being as a society.
The key to this liberal ideology is the belief in tolerance or non-discrimination as the ruling principle of society, the principle to which all other principles must yield. We see this belief at work in every area of modern life. The principle of non-discrimination must, if followed consistently, destroy every human society and institution. A society that cannot discriminate between itself and other societies will go out of existence, just as an elm tree that cannot discriminate between itself and a linden tree must go out of existence.
To be, we must be able to say that we are us, which means that we are different from others. If we are not allowed to distinguish between ourselves and Muslims, if we must open ourselves to everyone and everything in the world that is different from us, and if the more different and threatening the Other is, the more we must open ourselves to it, then we go out of existence.
This liberal principle of destruction is utterly simple and radically extreme. Yet very, very few people, even self-described hard-line conservatives, are aware of this principle and the hold it has over our society. Instead of opposing non-discrimination, they oppose multiculturalism and political correctness.
But let’s say that we got rid of multiculturalism and political correctness. Would that end Muslim immigration? No. Multiculturalism is not the source of Muslim immigration. The source of it is our belief that we must not discriminate against other people on the basis of their culture, their ethnicity, their nationality, their religion. This is the idea of the 1965 Immigration Act, which was the idea of the 1964 Civil Rights Act applied to all of humanity: all discrimination is wrong, period.No one in today’s society, including conservatives, feels comfortable identifying this utterly simple idea, because that would mean opposing it.
To see how powerful the belief in non-discrimination is, consider this: Prior to World War II, would any Western country have considered admitting significant numbers of Muslim immigrants? Of course not; it would have been out of the question. The West had a concrete identity. It saw itself as white and in large part as Christian, and there was still active in the Western mind the knowledge that Islam was our historic adversary, as it has been for a thousand years, and radically alien. But today, the very notion of stopping Muslim immigration is out of the question, it can’t even be thought.
What would have been inconceivable 70 or 80 years ago is unquestionable today. A society that 70 years ago wouldn’t have dreamed of admitting large numbers of Muslims, today doesn’t dream of reducing, let alone stopping, the immigration of Muslims. Even the most impassioned anti-Islamic Cassandras never question—indeed they never even mention—the immigration of Muslims, or say it should be reduced or stopped.
You don’t need to know any more than what I’ve just said. The rule of non-discrimination, in all its destructive potentialities, is shown in this amazing fact, that the writers and activists who constantly cry that Islam is a mortal danger to our society will not say that we ought to stop or even reduce Muslim immigration.
Such is the liberal belief which says that the most morally wrong thing is for people to have a critical view of a foreign group, to want to exclude that group or keep it out.
We are constantly being brained by the hare-brained slogan, We are a nation of immigrants. No. We. Are. Not. Let's remind ourselves of our history with this song about The Preamble to the Constitution from Schoolhouse Rock:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Who were the people who wrote that and what people were they describing; were they thinking of Mahometans as being included as part of the future generations for which they were establishing the Constitution and securing liberty? They were Colonists - who had purchased land from the Indians - who were establishing a nation of other colonists who were of the same race (white) , religion (christian), and culture (english/european). Here are excerpts from Federalist 2 by John Jay, First Chief Justice (and vicious anti-Catholic) of The SCOTUS writing to New Yorkers in trying to get them to vote in favor of the Constitution. I broke-up the piece into different paragraphs than that as originally drafted.
Federalist No. 2
To the People of the State of New York:
WHEN the people of America reflect that they are now called upon to decide a question, which, in its consequences, must prove one of the most important that ever engaged their attention, the propriety of their taking a very comprehensive, as well as a very serious, view of it, will be evident.
Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of government, and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, the people must cede to it some of their natural rights in order to vest it with requisite powers. It is well worthy of consideration therefore, whether it would conduce more to the interest of the people of America that they should, to all general purposes, be one nation, under one federal government, or that they should divide themselves into separate confederacies, and give to the head of each the same kind of powers which they are advised to place in one national government.
It has until lately been a received and uncontradicted opinion that the prosperity of the people of America depended on their continuing firmly united, and the wishes, prayers, and efforts of our best and wisest citizens have been constantly directed to that object.
But politicians now appear, who insist that this opinion is erroneous, and that instead of looking for safety and happiness in union, we ought to seek it in a division of the States into distinct confederacies or sovereignties. However extraordinary this new doctrine may appear, it nevertheless has its advocates; and certain characters who were much opposed to it formerly, are at present of the number. Whatever may be the arguments or inducements which have wrought this change in the sentiments and declarations of these gentlemen, it certainly would not be wise in the people at large to adopt these new political tenets without being fully convinced that they are founded in truth and sound policy.
It has often given me pleasure to observe that independent America was not composed of detached and distant territories, but that one connected, fertile, widespreading country was the portion of our western sons of liberty. Providence has in a particular manner blessed it with a variety of soils and productions, and watered it with innumerable streams, for the delight and accommodation of its inhabitants. A succession of navigable waters forms a kind of chain round its borders, as if to bind it together; while the most noble rivers in the world, running at convenient distances, present them with highways for the easy communication of friendly aids, and the mutual transportation and exchange of their various commodities.
With equal pleasure I have as often taken notice that Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people--a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established general liberty and independence.
This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.
Similar sentiments have hitherto prevailed among all orders and denominations of men among us. To all general purposes we have uniformly been one people each individual citizen everywhere enjoying the same national rights, privileges, and protection. As a nation we have made peace and war; as a nation we have vanquished our common enemies; as a nation we have formed alliances, and made treaties, and entered into various compacts and conventions with foreign states...
PUBLIUS.
It is routinely claimed that we can not go back to the ways things used to be - a country with borders and a shared faith, race, and culture and that America is better off as being a proposition nation; that is, an ideological nation that does not have solid borders, shared language, common Christians customs, and a historical heritage. O, and such things are not for whites only for as Dr. E. Michael Jones observes, Ethos requires Logos if it is to work.
No, we are routinely being told, an unassimiable Mahometan from Morocco can fit into America just as easily as an English talking Christian man born in Liverpool can fit into America.
