Sunday, December 22, 2024

Jesus was born on the 25th

 


There are, roughly, 666 thousand evangelicals who spend their Advent and Christmastide trying to disprove the accurate historical date of The Incarnation by citing the Shepherds in the field and claiming that "it was too cold" and so that proves Jesus wasn't born on the 25th and that date really is the feast of Sol Invictus which means the Catholic Church is suffused with paganism blah, blah, blah...

Well, here is an impeachable source in that the source is Jewish and he wrote a book that proves that there WERE shepherds in the field with their flocks at that time - and that they were their tending their sheep which were intended for sacrifice - talk about an unintended proof of birth of The Saviour, The Lamb of God, who was to die for our sins as an act of propitiation....

In any event, here is Edelsheim: Alfred Edersheim, in his "The Life and Times of Jesus"


...And yet Jewish tradition may here prove both illustrative and helpful. That the Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem, was a settled conviction. Equally so, was the belief , that He was to be revealed from Migdal Eder, 'the tower of the flock.' This Migdal Eder was not the watchtower for the ordinary flocks which pastured on the barren sheepground beyond Bethlehem, but lay close to the town, on the road to Jerusalem. A passage in the Mishnah [951] leads to the conclusion, that the flocks, which pastured there, were destined for Temple-sacrifices [952], and, accordingly, that the shepherds, who watched over them, were not ordinary shepherds. The latter were under the ban of Rabbinism, on account of their necessary isolation from religious ordinances, and their manner of life, which rendered strict legal observance unlikely, if not absolutely impossible. The same Mishnaic passage also leads us to infer, that these flocks lay out all the year round, since they are spoken of as in the fields thirty days before the Passover -- that is, in the month of February, when in Palestine the average rainfall is nearly greatest.

Thus, Jewish tradition in some dim manner apprehended the first revelation of the Messiah from that Migdal Eder, where shepherds watched the Temple-flocks all the year round. Of the deep symbolic significance of such a coincidence, it is needless to speak.

It was, then, on that ‘wintry night’ of the 25th of December, that shepherds watched the flocks destined for sacrificial services, in the very place consecrated by tradition as that where the Messiah was to be first revealed. 



I don't know if this free download is still available but it is an excellent resource.

Saturday, December 21, 2024

Dom Gueranger Dec 25th

 We apply the name of Christmas to the forty days which begin with the Nativity of our Lord, December 25, and end with the Purification of the Blessed Virgin, February 2. It is a period which forms a distinct portion of the Liturgical Year, as distinct, by its own special spirit, from every other, as are Advent, Lent, Easter, or Pentecost. One same Mystery is celebrated and kept in view during the whole forty days. Neither the Feasts of the Saints, which so abound during this Season; nor the time of Septuagesima, with its mournful Purple, which often begins before Christmastide is over, seem able to distract our Holy Mother the Church from the immense joy of which she received the good tidings from the Angels [St Luke ii 10] on that glorious Night for which the world had been longing four thousand years. The Faithful will remember that the Liturgy commemorates this long expectation by the four penitential weeks of Advent.

The custom of celebrating the Solemnity of our Saviour’s Nativity by a feast or commemoration of forty days’ duration is founded on the holy Gospel itself; for it tells us that the Blessed Virgin Mary, after spending forty days in the contemplation of the Divine Fruit of her glorious Maternity, went to the Temple, there to fulfil, in most perfect humility, the ceremonies which the Law demanded of the daughters of Israel, when they became mothers.

The Feast of Mary’s Purification is, therefore, part of that of Jesus’ Birth; and the custom of keeping this holy and glorious period of forty days as one continued Festival has every appearance of being a very ancient one, at least in the Roman Church. And firstly, with regard to our Saviour’s Birth on December 25, we have St John Chrysostom telling us, in his Homily for this Feast, that the Western Churches had, from the very commencement of Christianity, kept it on this day. He is not satisfied with merely mentioning the tradition; he undertakes to show that it is well founded, inasmuch as the Church of Rome had every means of knowing the true day of our Saviour’s Birth, since the acts of the Enrolment, taken in Judea by command of Augustus, were kept in the public archives of Rome. The holy Doctor adduces a second argument, which he founds upon the Gospel of St Luke, and he reasons thus: we know from the sacred Scriptures that it must have been in the fast of the seventh month [Lev. xxiii 24 and following verses. The seventh month (or Tisri) corresponded to the end of our September and beginning of our October. -Tr.] that the Priest Zachary had the vision in the Temple; after which Elizabeth, his wife, conceived St John the Baptist: hence it follows that the Blessed Virgin Mary having, as the Evangelist St Luke relates, received the Angel Gabriel’s visit, and conceived the Saviour of the world in the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, that is to say, in March, the Birth of Jesus must have taken place in the month of December.

But it was not till the fourth century that the Churches of the East began to keep the Feast of our Saviour’s Birth in the month of December. Up to that period they had kept it at one time on the sixth of January, thus uniting it, under the generic term of Epiphany, with the Manifestation of our Saviour made to the Magi, and in them to the Gentiles; at another time, as Clement of Alexandria tells us, they kept it on the 25th of the month Pachon (May 15), or on the 25th of the month Pharmuth (April 20). St John Chrysostom, in the Homily we have just cited, which he gave in 386, tells us that the Roman custom of celebrating the Birth of our Saviour on December 25 had then only been observed ten years in the Church of Antioch. It is probable that this change had been introduced in obedience to the wishes of the Apostolic See, wishes which received additional weight by the edict of the Emperors Theodosius and Valentinian, which appeared towards the close of the fourth century, and decreed that the Nativity and Epiphany of our Lord should be made two distinct Festivals. The only Church that has maintained the custom of celebrating the two mysteries on January 6 is that of Armenia; owing, no doubt, to the circumstance of that country not being under the authority of the Emperors; as also because it was withdrawn at an early period from the influence of Rome by schism and heresy.

The Feast of our Lady’s Purification, with which the forty days of Christmas close, is, in the Latin Church, of very great antiquity; so ancient, indeed, as to preclude the possibility of our fixing the date of its institution. According to the unanimous opinion of Liturgists, it is the most ancient of all the Feasts of the Holy Mother of God; and as her Purification is related in the Gospel itself, they rightly infer that its anniversary was solemnized at the very commencement of Christianity. Of course, this is only to be understood of the Roman Church; for as regards the Oriental Church, we find that this Feast was not definitely fixed to February 2 until the reign of the Emperor Justinian, in the sixth century. It is true that the Eastern Christians had previously to that time a sort of commemoration of this Mystery, but it was far from being a universal custom, and it was kept a few days after the Feast of our Lord’s Nativity, and not on the day itself of Mary’s going up to the Temple.

But what is the characteristic of Christmas in the Latin Liturgy? It is twofold: it is joy, which the whole Church feels at the coming of the divine Word in the Flesh; and it is admiration of that glorious Virgin, who was made the Mother of God. There is scarcely a prayer, or a rite, in the Liturgy of this glad Season, which does not imply these two grand Mysteries: an Infant-God, and a Virgin-Mother.

For example, on all Sundays and Feasts which are not Doubles, the Church, throughout these forty days, makes a commemoration of the fruitful virginity [The Collect, Deus qui salutis aeternae beatae Mariae Virginiate fecunda humano generi, etc.] of the Mother of God, by three special Prayers in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. She begs the suffrage of Mary by proclaiming her quality of Mother of God and her inviolate purity [V. Post partum, Virgo, inviolata permansisti. R. Dei Genitrix, intercede pro nobis.], which remained in her even after she had given birth to her Son. And again the magnificent Anthem, Alma Redemptoris, composed by the Monk Herman Contractus, continues, up to the very day of the Purification, to be the termination of each Canonical Hour. It is by such manifestations of her love and veneration that the Church, honouring the Son in the Mother, testifies her holy joy during this season of the Liturgical Year, which we call Christmas.

Our readers are aware that, when Easter Sunday falls at its latest - that is, in April - the Ecclesiastical Calendar counts as many as six Sundays after the Epiphany. Christmastide (that is, the forty days between Christmas Day and the Purification) includes sometimes four out of these six Sundays; frequently only two; and some times only one, as in the case when Easter comes so early as to necessitate keeping Septuagesima, and even Sexagesima Sunday, in January. Still, nothing is changed, as we have already said, in the ritual observances of this joyous season, excepting only that on those two Sundays, the fore-runners of Lent, the Vestments are purple, and the Gloria in excelsis is omitted.

Although our holy Mother the Church honours with especial devotion the Mystery of the Divine Infancy during the whole season of Christmas; yet, she is obliged to introduce into the Liturgy of this same season passages from the holy Gospels which seem premature, inasmuch as they relate to the active life of Jesus. This is owing to there being less than six months allotted by the Calendar for the celebration of the entire work of our Redemption: in other words, Christmas and Easter are so near each other, even when Easter is as late as it can be, that Mysteries must of necessity be crowded into the interval; and this entails anticipation. And yet the Liturgy never loses sight of the Divine Babe and his incomparable Mother, and never tires in their praises, during the whole period from the Nativity to the day when Mary comes to the Temple to present her Jesus.

The Greeks, too, make frequent commemorations of the Maternity of Mary in their Offices of this Season: but they have a special veneration for the twelve days between Christmas Day and the Epiphany, which, in their Liturgy, are called the Dodecameron. During this time they observe no days of Abstinence from flesh-meat; and the Emperors of the East had, out of respect for the great Mystery, decreed that no servile work should be done, and that the Courts of Law should be closed, until after January 6.

From this outline of the history of the holy season, we can understand what is the characteristic of this second portion of the Liturgical Year, which we call Christmas, and which has ever been a season most dear to the Christian world. What are the Mysteries embodied in its Liturgy will be shown in the following chapter.



Friday, December 20, 2024

Friday Fun - Blog Photo explained.




 Hey, Mick, T'Hell is the deal with your blog photo?


Thank you for the question pretend interlocutor. 

Because the rest of the world hates America with such savage intensity, Ol' Mick began to anticipate and prepare to survive a sneak nuclear attack.

Mick took FIL's (Father in Law) Welding Mask, put it on, and climbed on top of MIL's (Mother in Law) Van and I had her drive me around day and night for months.

If the surprise nuclear attack happened I would see the flash of the explosion and not be blinded and I would have enough time to roll off the top of  the van into a ditch before the blast of the Nuclear explosion would safely pass over me.

I could then take off the Welding Mask, bury my beloved MIL in a shallow grave, and hightail it to Costco where I could grab as much free merchandise as I could stuff into the van. 

After a few months, when there was no surprise nuclear attack, my exhausted MIL convinced me to abandon my plan but never let it be said I was unprepared to do whatever is necessary to survive, thrive and keep liberty alive.

Friday Fun

Some believe their progenitors were Gorillas in the mist.

Some believe in life from nothing; we call them atheists.

Others trust the Bible; they believe Genesis is not a myth,

While boxers with broken teeth threaten others with their fyths.







 Dimitri Petrov, the Social Studies Teacher.


Sometimes something as simple as the hiring of a foreign born Social Studies Teacher can have far ranging consequences; complicated consequences like when the tenth grade daughter of a prominent town selectmen got knocked-up leading to the formation of an obvious cover story of a "very sick" aunt in New York who required convalescence care which would be provided by the selectman's daughter for roughly nine months so his family could avoid social ostracism at The Crown Point Country Club.

It was said of Petrov that he was from The Ukraine, which, as you well know, was enough to start the argument ball rolling down Skitchewaug Trail before it ended up crashing into and sinking in the quarry. 

Many seasonal members of The Crown Point Country Club claimed that The Ukraine should be called simply Ukraine while others were adamant the article "The" was necessary when speaking about the bread basket of Russia because The Ukraine refers to the borderland or edge of Russia.

In other words, it was an unnecessary and unwelcome distraction from the normal topics of interest in the teeny villages and small Southern Vermont towns which bordered, if you will, Springfield; topics such as - Well, Jane, you know how those women living up on Cherry Hill are; if  they are not using eye-liner, or galavanting around wearing wigs and falsies, they are reading "The Tropic of Cancer" or some other smut, that's just how they are.

Petrov was hired as The Social Studies Teacher at the local high school and as early as the second quarter of the school year, controversy and enmity began to surface which, eventually, led to Petrov catching some lead in his gut and slowly bleeding out in the hills of Dummerston the first day of deer hunting season.

That fateful second quarter of the school year began when Petrov first advanced his claim that the historicity of Genesis was suspect and when that commie claim was combined with his claim that the local village idiot, a kid nick-named Gibby The Grinning Goon ought to be listened to because he was blessed with a great gift, then what ineluctably followed in the chain of events was not a great surprise.

Village Idiots have a long and storied history in Vermont and the towns and villages where they lived were always understanding and tolerant of The Village Idiots and their weird behavior but a highly questionable practice began to develop amongst the Quakers and progressives in Vermont to the point where one village idiot, a Mr. Patrick Leahy, was not only tolerated but respected, to such an obscene level that the normally rock-solid citizens imagined the idiot was possessed of some sort of constitutional, economic, military or  spiritual wisdom and he ended-up getting elected as a United States Senator from Montpelier but most folks explained that away by noting, Well, he was born there and it's where the State Capital is, so...

OK, that detour into the detritus of democracy aside, let's pick back up the thread of the Petrov controversy.

As we already noted, the commie bastid, Petrov, had openly questioned the historicity of Genesis and onto that conflagration of such a sulphurous suggestion, he heaped upon that the coals of claiming the Village Idiot, Gibby the Grinning Goon, was blessed with the ability to divine the future because he was a natural born Haruspex.




Oncet, Petrov was driving over the North Springfield Flood Control Dam when he espied Gibby the Grinning Goon using his Dad's old Five Iron to brain the Suckers and Catfish he had hooked in the spillway of the dam.

As Petrov peered at the perplexing actions of Gibby, he noticed that the idiot stood there for quite some time staring at the results of his office - the blood and brains of the fish spilled out onto the rocks - as they slowly dried in the sun. 

When the idiot finally walked up onto the road of the Dam, Petrov accosted him and asked - What did you see? What did the brains tell you about the future? - Gibby the Grinning Goon grunted, "Bad."

Just as I thoughtmurmured Petrov and he drove off by himself to get an ice cream cone at Spur's after the idiot refused his offer of a ride.

It was only a few months later that the good rock-ribbed sensible men of the rocky redoubt that is Southern Vermont, having learned of this infamy, decided to invite Petrov to camp for the first day of deer season.

The night before opening day, the men got Petrov gooned on Vodka as they played endless games of Pitch. To make matters worse, they woke him up early.

As they led him out into the field, sweating and suffering from a wicked hangover, he wondered why his new friends had really asked him to stand unmoving in the middle a field because, even though he had never hunted deer before,  their explanation - You will be a deer lure - didn't make much sense.

Suddenly, as a few shots rang out - he felt the hot lead slamming into his gut before he heard the first shot - and it all began to make sense to Petrov - They don't like me - and his thoughts were borne from his head by his blood that began to pool out onto the frozen dirt. 

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

Rome will lose the faith?

While Mick, obviously, is disconcerted about the reign of novelty and change under this and previous, to be frank, Pontificates, I know I'll never leave the Catholic Church or break communion with he whom the Church says is the Pope.

It is the Church, not individuals, who decides who is and isn't Pope and even if a Pope seems suspect, he remains Pope ,and Jesus remains the Head of His Church.

That aside, there has always been speculation about the putative private relations by one of the seers at LaSalette who claims that Rome will lose the Faith.

Well, what about the seer who made this claim, is it a prophecy made to her by Mary?

Not hardly...

https://crc-internet.org/our-doctrine/catholic-counter-reformation/secret-la-salette/melanies-secret/melanies-writings.html


A worthy read about Our Pope and Our Cross

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2024/06/don-pietro-leone-is-pope-francis-pope.html



https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2024/12/don-pietro-leone-is-francis-pope-if-not.html



Monday, December 16, 2024

Advent

 


Mick has spent years asking the Knights of Columbus to produce car stickers that do not merely ape the protestant ones - "Keep Christ in Christmas"- ones that they sell at the beginning of every Advent.


The KOC do not appear to understand that Advent is
its own season and that Christmas has not yet arrived.


Mick made his own sticker (one can do it 
online) and affixed it to his car.


The reader has to scroll down to see it














Sunday, December 15, 2024

The Synod on Synodality

 https://akacatholic.com/synod-on-synodality-one-step-closer-to-the-end/


Denzinger 


The Power Attributed to the Community of the Church, in Order That by This the Power May Be Communicated to the Pastors

[Episcopal Convocation]
  

1502 2. The proposition which states "that power has been given by God to the Church, that it might be communicated to the pastors who are its ministers for the salvation of souls"; if thus understood that the power of ecclesiastical ministry and of rule is derived from the COMMUNITY of the faithful to the pastors,--heretical.

1836  [Argument from the assent of the Church]. To satisfy this pastoral duty, our predecessors always gave tireless attention that the saving doctrine of Christ be spread among all the peoples of the earth, and with equal care they watched that, wherever it was received, it was preserved sound and pure. Therefore, the bishops of the whole world, now individually, now gathered in Synods, following a long custom of the churches and the formula of the ancient rule, referred to this Holy See those dangers particularly which emerged in the affairs of faith, that there especially the damages to faith might be repaired where faith cannot experience a failure. * The Roman Pontiffs, moreover, according as the condition of the times and affairs advised, sometimes by calling ecumenical Councils or by examining the opinion of the Church spread throughout the world; sometimes by particular synods, sometimes by employing other helps which divine Providence supplied, have defined that those matters must be held which with God's help they have recognized as in agreement with Sacred Scripture and apostolic tradition. For, the Holy Spirit was not promised to the successors of Peter that by His revelation they might disclose new doctrine, but that by His help they might guard sacredly the revelation transmitted through the apostles and the deposit of faith, and might faithfully set it forth. Indeed, all the venerable fathers have embraced their apostolic doctrine, and the holy orthodox Doctors have venerated and followed it, knowing full well that the See of St. Peter always remains unimpaired by any error, according to the divine promise of our Lord the Savior made to the chief of His disciples: "I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and thou, being once converted, confirm thy brethren" [Luke 22:32].


Vatican 1 

Chapter 2. On the permanence of the primacy of blessed Peter in the Roman pontiffs

  1. That which our lord Jesus Christ, the prince of shepherds and great shepherd of the sheep, established in the blessed apostle Peter, for the continual salvation and permanent benefit of the church, must of necessity remain for ever, by Christ’s authority, in the church which, founded as it is upon a rock, will stand firm until the end of time [45] .
  2. For no one can be in doubt, indeed it was known in every age that the holy and most blessed Peter, prince and head of the apostles, the pillar of faith and the foundation of the catholic church, received the keys of the kingdom from our lord Jesus Christ, the saviour and redeemer of the human race, and that to this day and for ever he lives and presides and exercises judgment in his successors the bishops of the holy Roman see, which he founded and consecrated with his blood [46] .
  3. Therefore whoever succeeds to the chair of Peter obtains by the institution of Christ himself, the primacy of Peter over the whole church. So what the truth has ordained stands firm, and blessed Peter perseveres in the rock-like strength he was granted, and does not abandon that guidance of the church which he once received [47] .
  4. For this reason it has always been necessary for every church–that is to say the faithful throughout the world–to be in agreement with the Roman church because of its more effective leadership. In consequence of being joined, as members to head, with that see, from which the rights of sacred communion flow to all, they will grow together into the structure of a single body [48] .
  5. Therefore,
    • if anyone says that
      • it is not by the institution of Christ the lord himself (that is to say, by divine law) that blessed Peter should have perpetual successors in the primacy over the whole church; or that
      • the Roman pontiff is not the successor of blessed Peter in this primacy:

      let him be anathema.