Is there any hope of a Counter-Revolution in the Church?

 Prayer to Saint Michael the Archangel, excerpt:

 ...These most crafty enemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church, the spouse of the immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on her most sacred possessions. In the Holy Place itself, where the See of Holy Peter and the Chair of Truth has been set up as the light of the world, they have raised the throne of their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has been struck, the sheep may be scattered...

The wicked have struck The Holy See and come into possession of the Holy See in the person, praxis and programs of Francis and the Episcopacy has been silenced by fear into not opposing him or facing him down and many sheep have been scattered and scandalised to the point where they have simply quit the Faith once delivered or have thrown-in with various schismatic and/or heretical sects.

We know from the fairly recent past - the 1960s Synod - that the powers that be are loathe to actualise the Counter-Revolution necessary to restore than which came before the inauthentic and illegitimate implementation of a revolution that pre-existed the calling of the Council, the Council that was called for by faithful Catholics like Cardinals Ottaviani and Ruffini to address the problems of modernity and the internal decay of the church and the external threat of modern life, neither of which were effectively confronted or confronted by Pope Pius XII.

Authorities fear the response were they to act as decisively and forcefully as did the revolutionaries of the 60s Synod which is an unspoken confession that they accept the consequences of the revolution so there will be peace.

The authorities that will succeed Francis will inherit a church nearly entirely destroyed and they will not do what is necessary - establish a Counter-Revolution -because "There has already been way too much change" and so their inaction will tend to secure and preserve the modernist triumphs of the revolution.

They will want peace while their leader - Jesus Christ - did not come to bring peace but the truth and truth divides:

Matthew  Do not think that I came to send peace upon earth: I came not to send peace, but the sword. For I came to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man's enemies shall be they of his own household. He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me; and he that loveth son or daughter more than me, is not worthy of me. And he that taketh not up his cross, and followeth me, is not worthy of me

Authorities who succeed Francis and his Bishops must do everything in their power (and they have a LOT of power, Legislative, Juridical and Coercitive) to restore what the revolutionaries destroyed but they have become too worldly and they want the world to love and accept them as peaceful men.

Jesus taught them the the world will hate them as it hated Him (IF they act like He commanded them to act) but, as we well know - Paul VI told the Roman Clergy that he could have disciplined the untoward but he "Wanted to be loved - " and the world loves Francis and he loves it right back.