What elections should be about

 Ever since the Judicial Branch, in  Marbury v. Madison, the Judiciary has seized unconstitutional authority for itself over the other two branches of government.

We no longer have three separate but equal branches of government which can be most clearly seen in how the Judiciary can claim that any specific act of the Legislative Branch or the Executive Branch is Unconstitutional and voids that act.

Can the Legislative Branch declare a specific act of the Judiciary or the Executive Branch UnConstitutional and void that decision? No, but it could do so if there really were Three Separate but Equal branches of government.

Can the Executive Branch declare a specific act of the Judiciary or Legislative Branch Unconstitutional and void that act? No, but it could, and should, if there really were Three Separate but Equal branches of government and if those acts by one of the other two branches of government are Unconstitutional.

What would be the consequences of all branches of government acting as though they really were Separate but Equal?

Would their be chaos and confusion?

Likely, until We the People were taught that this is Our Constitution, not the possession of people appointed and approved for an office that has no term limits.

We the people must retake possession of the Constitution and if Trump had acted with courage we might have seized control of it back then.

Let’s say that Trump had declared an act of The SCOTUS Unconstitutional, who would it be that ultimately ruled on The Constitutionality of the action by Trump, would it be the SCOTUS itself or the Legislative Branch?

No, ideally (and even, eventually, practically) it would be We the people through the next political campaign following who would decide whether or not what was done was or was not Constitutional. Those campaigning for national office would have to argue either being in favor of or opposed to that action.

Imagine political campaigns focused on The Constitution of We the people rather than campaigns being about who said what 50 years ago, nicknames, doggerel, or who had their picture taken in a tank? Imagine those campaigning for national office being expected to know Our Constitution and being able to explain it in laymen’s terms?

This really is the only peaceful way for We the People to take back control of Our Constitution -  it was written by and for We the People, not tyrants wearing black robes.