PINO Bergoglio

https://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.com/2019/11/the-temporary-suspense-of-function-of.html

PINO (Pope In Name Only) Bergoglio can not be the real Pope because we know from the  infallible teaching of Vatican One that he is excluded from that august office by virtue of what he says and does;

On the permanence of the primacy of blessed Peter in the Roman pontiffs

1. That which our lord Jesus Christ, the prince of shepherds and great shepherd of the sheep, established in the blessed apostle Peter, for the continual salvation and permanent benefit of the Church, must of necessity remain for ever, by Christ's authority, in the Church which, founded as it is upon a rock, will stand firm until the end of time [45].

2. For no one can be in doubt, indeed it was known in every age that the holy and most blessed Peter, prince and head of the apostles, the pillar of faith and the foundation of the Catholic Church, received the keys of the kingdom from our lord Jesus Christ, the savior and redeemer of the human race, and that to this day and for ever he (Jesus Christ) lives and presides and exercises judgment in his successors the bishops of the Holy Roman See, which he founded and consecrated with his blood [46].

What sentient Catholic believes that Jesus Christ is exercising His judgement via PINO Bergoglio?

https://en-denzingerbergoglio.com

Fr, Hunwicke, basing his argumentation on that of Saint John Henry Newman, tries to make the case that Francis is Pope but that he has suspended his teaching authority/power:

https://liturgicalnotes.blogspot.com/search?q=magisterium+of+francis

But, there are gigantic problems with that type of parallel argumentation - This PINO is not being held captive by an Emperor as Liberius was, he is not being tortured and he is roaming all over Hell and half of Georgia preaching and practicing his heresies whereas Saint Athanasius defended the orthodoxy of Liberius and Liberius is a Saint.

41. Lapse of Liberius

Who that shall hear what they did in the course of these proceedings will not think them to be anything rather than Christians? When Liberius sent Eutropius, a Presbyter, and Hilarius, a Deacon, with letters to the Emperor, at the time that Lucifer and his fellows made their confession, they banished the Presbyter on the spot, and after stripping Hilarius the Deacon and scourging him on the back, they banished him too, clamouring at him, 'Why did you not resist Liberius instead of being the bearer of letters from him.' Ursacius and Valens, with the eunuchs who sided with them, were the authors of this outrage. The Deacon, while he was being scourged, praised the Lord, remembering His words, 'I gave My back to the smiters Isaiah 50:6;' but they while they scourged him laughed and mocked him, feeling no shame that they were insulting a Levite. Indeed they acted but consistently in laughing while he continued to praise God; for it is the part of Christians to endure stripes, but to scourge Christians is the outrage of a Pilate or a Caiaphas. Thus they endeavoured at the first to corrupt the Church of the Romans, wishing to introduce impiety into it as well as others. But Liberius after he had been in banishment two years gave way, and from fear of threatened death subscribed. Yet even this only shows their violent conduct, and the hatred of Liberius against the heresy, and his support of Athanasius, so long as he was suffered to exercise a free choice. For that which men are forced by torture to do contrary to their first judgment, ought not to be considered the willing deed of those who are in fear, but rather of their tormentors. They however attempted everything in support of their heresy, while the people in every Church, preserving the faith which they had learned, waited for the return of their teachers, and condemned the Antichristian heresy, and all avoid it, as they would a serpent.

https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/28155.htm

Now if anyone wishes to become acquainted with my case, and the falsehood of Eusebius and his fellows, let him read what has been written in my behalf, and let him hear the witnesses, not one, or two, or three, but that great number of Bishops; and again let him attend to the witnesses of these proceedings, Liberius and Hosius, and their fellows, who when they saw the attempts made against us, chose rather to endure all manner of sufferings than to give up the truth, and the judgment which had been pronounced in our favour. And this they did with an honourable and righteous intention, for what they suffered proves to what straits the other Bishops were reduced. And they are memorials and records against the Arian heresy, and the wickedness of false accusers, and afford a pattern and model for those who come after, to contend for the truth unto death Sirach 4:28, and to abominate the Arian heresy which fights against Christ, and is a forerunner of Antichrist, and not to believe those who attempt to speak against me. For the defense put forth, and the sentence given, by so many Bishops of high character, are a trustworthy and sufficient testimony in our behalf.

https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2808.htm

http://theradtrad.blogspot.com/2014/03/st-liberius-pope-of-rome.html

http://theradtrad.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-heretical-pope-tradistan.html

In referring to Liberius, it profits us to remember he was tortured before submitting to the formula (if he even did sign some formula) and the great Saint Athanasius blamed those who tortured him and he praised Liberius for his orthodoxy in, History of The Arians (and, interestingly enough, amongst the influential and powerful subscribers to the heresy were those lacking masculinity, the eunuchs).

But Liberius after he had been in banishment two years gave way, and from fear of threatened death subscribed. Yet even this only shows their violent conduct, and the hatred of Liberius against the heresy, and his support of Athanasius, so long as he was suffered to exercise a free choice. For that which men are forced by torture to do contrary to their first judgment, ought not to be considered the willing deed of those who are in fear, but rather of their tormentors. 


Liberius, as the great clergy of Papa Stronsay have stressed, is a Saint…

https://www.papastronsay.com/resources/PopeLiberius/Rohrbacher.htm

"St. Liberius" 352-366 Sources of Catholic Dogma entry between 57 e and 58

Sources of Catholic Dogma #93 St. Anastasius I 398-401 "The Orthodoxy of Pope Liberius"

Who thinks PINO Bergoglio, who is under no arrest and suffers no torture, is forced to teach and preach his heresies?

Who thinks that at some future point in time PINO Bergoglio will be Canonised?