Dear Elizanna. Ms. Engel is not impeccable and I have shown where she is in error and I have done so in considerable detail.
Ann Barnhardt's claims are not flawless. She has never studied canon law, taken a degree in canon law or practiced canon law but her claim is anchored in Canon Law.
I have cited the opinion of a woman who is a Canon Lawyer who shows how Ms. Ann is in error about substantial error.
Of course, you have liberty to say that Ms. Ann's personal opinion's are dispositive on the matter of whether or not Francis is Pope and that every single Cardinal and Bishop of the Catholic Church who accepted the election of Francis is wrong.
Elizanna commented on "Randy Engel and her unsubstantiated accusations and questionable scholarship (1)"
You are an ignorant troll. Engel's and Barnhardt's arguments are the result of considerable, fastidious research and supported by proven facts in Engel's case and to some extent in Barnhardt's. Have you ever actually READ their works? The logic of AB's arguments is flawless and she has, in fact, many supporters, among them the likes of Prof. Edmund Mazza. Many priests and even some bishops believe Bergoglio is an antipope; and thousands of us lay people see and understand what is right in front of us: a manifest public heretic
who could not possibly enjoy the protection of the Holy Spirit to safeguard the Faith. Why don't you actually study the works yourself instead of pontificating from the comfort of your little computer to the many of us who actually use the brain God gave us. Well, what can one expect from the likes of someone who trusts Wikipedia for his information. Time to man up or get off the internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Check with your doctor