The Seven Heresies of Bergoglio

 

Never forget that when Negroes commit crimes it is your fault

 https://archive.is/IJLea

Dear white reader. Why are you so mean and why do you never lift a finger to help a minority?

What's that?  You have?

Doesn't matter, you just do more. 

Give them everything you have. 

It's only fair.

The cost of Black America

If you are a white American, over the course of your lifetime the federal government will, on average and on your behalf, transfer $384,109 of your wealth and income to a single black individual.

According to the data derived from the 2014 federal budget, the average annual net tax/benefit broke down as follows:

• White: -$2,795
• Black: +$10,016

Over the course of an average 79-year lifespan, a white individual contributes a net $220,805 to the system, whereas over the course of an average 75-year lifespan, a black individual receives a net $751,200. However, since there are 4.6 times more whites than blacks in the USA, the black share has to be divided among the various contributors to sort out a one-to-one comparison.

So, the net cost to the average White American of the average Black American is $384,109. Married? That’s $768,218. Got 2 kids? That’s $1,536,436. 4 kids? Now we’re talking $2,304,654 lifetime.

Diversity is expensive. Now you understand why you won’t have much of an inheritance to leave to your children. Do you really think it’s worth it? And then, those natural conservatives to the south, the Hispanics, will surely improve the situation, right? After all, immigration helps the economy! Well, not so much.

• Hispanic: +7,298

In fact, because there are more Hispanics in the USA than Blacks, Hispanics are already a bigger cumulative net drain on the economy, $411,950,000,000 to $389,710,000,000. Needless to say, the ongoing demographic change from a predominantly white society to a less productive, less white one can be expected to have even more serious negative effects on the long-term economic prospects of the United States that it already has.

To quote the original author: “The negative fiscal impact of blacks and hispanics is significant. All of this discussion of a “national debt” and “deficit” is primarily of function of blacks and hispanics. Without them, we would be running budget surpluses today, even when keeping the military the same size.”

And I haven't even addressed the Judicial pro-black, anti-white apartheid established beginning with the  t SCOTUS in Brown vs Board of Education, the "Civil Rights Act: etc etc etc 

Synod now about the Heretic Pope and his Parliament of Protestants.

 

The Vatican has established a series of unprecedented changes that give lay people more influence in the decisions of the Church. 

As many as 70 lay people will participate in the next assembly of the Synod of Bishops held in Rome this October. According to synod organizers, this group of full-time members will comprise more than 20% of those present. 

In addition, by Pope Francis' request, half of these 70 will be women. Until now—with a few exceptions—only bishops could vote at synod meetings.

The Synod of Bishops is a consultative council created by Pope Paul VI that was composed exclusively of clergy. Members meet periodically at the Pope's invitation to discuss Church matters. 

The result of these meetings is a document that gages how the group feels about an issue. The Pope is free to disregard these findings or incorporate them into his teachings. 

The organizers of the upcoming synod emphasized that these changes are important but also cautioned that the synod should not be equated to a parliament. 

Cardinal Mario Grech of Malta, Secretary General of the Synod, says he is in favor of eliminating the votes that decide the matters of introduction in the document delivered to the Pope. Cardinal Grech argues that this body should be more of a meeting for prayer than rule-making. 

Nope. Bishops have the Duty to Teach, Rule and Sanctify. If you don't think this will result in changes in doctrine you have not been paying attention.

This heretical Pope and His Parliament of Protestants were warned by Jesus about what would happen to those engaged in this perfidy 

JRB

Luke 19: 27 Jesus says "But as for those my enemies, who would not have me reign over them, bring them hither, and kill them before me."

Friday Fun

 

Amateurs can not pull this off. A real pro is required for this level of doctrinal Dadaism.

The Light of Christ or the Dark Doctrine of the Devil's Disciple Darwin?

 Father Faber

“...the Incarnation flows as completely by way of consequence from the mystery of Creation, as Transubstantiation does from the mystery of the Incarnation; and, if it were not so, to me all theology would be confusion.” 

“There is hardly any mystery the consideration of which is more fruitful in the soul than that of Creation... Even in devotional theology, meditation on the mystery of Creation is of great consequence. In its light many of our Blessed Lord’s mysteries give up deeper meanings to us.” 

1. “There is hardly any mystery the consideration of which is more fruitful in the soul than that of Creation”
   
2. “[M]editation on the mystery of Creation is of great consequence.”
   
3. “In its [the Creation mystery] light many of our Blessed Lord’s mysteries give up deeper meanings to us.”
   

“...the creation of the world...took place thousands of years ago” 

This Catholic priest shows that with the creation of the world taking place thousands of years ago, the myth that “young earth creationism” was developed by Protestants sometime in the 20th century, is false. This position of an earth under 10,000 years old, was held by this Catholic priest of the 19th century and held by Catholics of every century before it. 

Also notice, Fr. Faber mentions (p. 44) that the “creation of the world” is a “past mystery”. How much do fields in science attempt to take apart and unravel to disbelief, the following mysteries of: 

• 1)  The Virgin Birth
  
• 2)  The Trinity
  
• 3)  The Dual Nature of Christ
  
• 4)  The Divinity of Christ
  
• 5)  Substance changing on our altars
  (Transubstantiation)
  

“The earth, the sun, the moon, the stars, and all that forms the universe, have had a beginning. These creatures owe their existence to a Supreme Being...” 

“The earth...sun...moon...stars...” are “[t]hese creatures” 

“He made all things out of nothing by a mere act of His will; therefore, His attributes of power and of perfection exceed the comprehension of man.” 

Enter not into dispute with modern believers in the Dark Doctrines of the Devil's Disciple Darwin. 

If you do enter into dispute with evolutionists know they will weigh you down with leaden materialism which will cause you to sink so far down into the enlightenment quicksand that the Light of Christ will not be able to reach you.

Calmly tell others the truth that the Catholic Church teaches and tell those who reject the truth that they who reject Divine Revelation will one day stand before the Judgment Seat of Christ to answer for their having turned a deaf ear to the voice of God.

Anno Mundi (A.M.), which is Latin for “in the year of the world,” was commonly used for identifying the year after creation that something existed. 

Here are two “A.M.” references on p. 7 of this Catholic work, 

“Malaleel, (Ma-la’le-el,) his son, was born A.M. 395; lived 395 years.
Jared, the son of Malaleel, was born A.M. 1422, and he lived 962 years.” 

Another reference to Anno Mundi, is on p. 9, “The ark was finished A.M. 1656.” 

One final reference for our purposes here is on p. 11, 

“...and all the days of Noah were 950 years, and he died in the year 2006. And Abraham was born two years after Noe’s death, A.M. 2008.” 

“...and, in order to shew [sic] that this creation was not the effect of any necessary cause, but the production of a voluntary act, God gave to this work successive degrees of perfection in an admirable order.” 

“...creation was not the effect of any necessary cause...”. 

“to shew [sic] that this creation was not the effect of any necessary cause...God gave to this work...an admirable order.” 

Dom Prosper Gueranger

Father Gueranger states: 

“Let us consider how the various nations on the face of the earth, though differing in customs, and speech, and interests, are all united in the expectation of a Deliverer soon to come. Neither the frightful corruption of morals, nor the long ages which have passed since the promises were given, have been able to efface the tradition, or the hope it inspired.” 

“The new Birth of our Redeemer takes place after four weeks, as the first Nativity happened after four thousand years, according to the Hebrew and Vulgate Chronology.” 

“With what gratitude ought they not to assist at that divine Sacrifice, for which the world had been longing for four thousand years! God has granted them to be born after the fulfilment of that stupendous and merciful oblation, and would not put them in the generations of men, who died before they could partake of its reality and its riches! This notwithstanding, they must earnestly unite with the Church, in praying for the coming of the Redeemer, so to pay their share of that great debt which God has put upon all, whether living before or after the fulfilment of the mystery of the Incarnation. Let them think of this in assisting at the holy Sacrifice.” 

“...the world had been created, and the human race had dwelt on this earth full four thousand years, before the Son of God took to himself the nature of man.” 

“Let us listen once more to the salutation, and we shall find from its last words that Gabriel is announcing the fulfilment of the divine oracle, and is addressing Mary as the woman foretold to be the instrument of the victory over Satan. ‘Blessed art thou among women.’ For four thousand years every woman has been under the curse of God, and has brought forth her children in suffering and sorrow: but here is the one among women, that has been ever blessed of God...that shall bring forth the fruit of her womb without travail.” 

“The year from the creation of the world, when in the beginning God created heaven and earth, five thousand one hundred and ninety-nine: from the deluge, the year two thousand nine hundred and fifty- seven: from the birth of Abraham, the year two thousand and fifteen: from Moses and the going out of the people of Israel from Egypt, the year one thousand five hundred and ten...” 

“On this one day alone, and on this single occasion, does the Church adopt the Septuagint chronology, according to which the birth of our Saviour took place five thousand years after the creation; whereas the Vulgate version, and the Hebrew text, place only four thousand between the two events. This is not a fitting place to explain the discrepancy of chronology; we merely allude to it as showing the liberty which the Church allows us on this question.” 

“But it was not enough to solemnize the great Day when Jesus, our Light, rose from the darkness of the tomb: there was another anniversary which claimed our grateful celebration. The Incarnate Word rose on the first day of the week,- that same day, whereon, four thousand years before, He, the Uncreated Word of the Father, had begun the work of Creation, by calling forth light, and separating it from darkness. The first day thus ennobled by the creation of light. It received a second consecration by the Resurrection of Jesus; and from that time forward Sunday, and not Saturday, was to be the Lord’s Day. Yes, our Resurrection in Jesus which took place on Sunday, gave the first day a preeminence above the others of the week: the divine precept of the Sabbath was abrogated together with the other ordinances of the Mosaic Law, and the Apostles instructed the faithful to keep holy the first day of the week, which God had dignified with that twofold glory, the creation and the regeneration of the world.” 

“Yes, our Resurrection in Jesus which took place on Sunday, gave the first day a preeminence above the others of the week: the divine precept of the Sabbath was abrogated together with the other ordinances of the Mosaic Law, and the Apostles instructed the faithful to keep holy the first day of the week, which God had dignified with that twofold glory, the creation and the regeneration of the world.” “...the Apostles instructed the faithful to keep holy the first day of the week, which God had dignified with that twofold glory, the creation and the regeneration of the world.” 

Baltimore Catechism

“72 Q. Did the Son of God become man immediately after the sin of our first parents?
A. The Son of God did not become man immediately after the sin of our first parents, but He was promised to them as a Redeemer. 

God did not say to Adam when He would send the Redeemer, and so the Redeemer did not come for about 4000 years after He was first promised. God permitted this long time to elapse in order that mankind might feel and know how great an evil sin is, and what misery it brought upon the world. During these 4000 years, men were becoming gradually worse. At one time- about 1600 years after Adam’s sin- they became so bad that God destroyed by a deluge, or great flood of water, all persons and living things upon the earth, except Noe, his wife, his three sons and their wives, and the animals they had in the ark with them (Genesis vi.).” 

“During these 4000 years men were becoming gradually worse.” 

“At one time- about 1600 years after Adam’s sin- they became so bad that God destroyed by a deluge, or great flood of water, all persons and living things upon the earth, except Noe, his wife, his three sons and their wives, and the animals they had in the ark with them (Genesis vi.). After God determined to destroy all living things on account of the wickedness of men, He told Noe...to build a great ark, or ship, for himself and his family, and for some of all the living creatures upon the earth (Genesis vii.).” 

“Noe spent a hundred years in making the ark. At that time men lived much longer than they do now. Adam lived over 900 years and Mathusala, the oldest man, lived to be 969 years old. There are many reasons why men live a shorter time now than then. When the door of the ark was closed, God sent a great rain that lasted for forty days and forty nights. All the springs of water broke forth...Men ran here and there to high places, while the water rose higher and higher till it covered the tops of the mountains, and all not in the ark were drowned. The big ark floated about for about a year...It took a long time, therefore, for the waters...to go down...” 

“46 Q. What other effects followed from the sin of our first parents? 

A. Our nature was corrupted by the sin of our first parents, which darkened our understanding, weakened our will, and left us a strong inclination to evil. 

Our ‘nature was corrupted’ is what I have said of the body rebelling against the soul. Our ‘understanding darkened.’ Adam knew much more without study than the most intelligent men could learn now with constant application. Before his fall he saw things clearly and understood them well, but after his sin everything had to be learned by the slow process of study.” 

St. Hilary of Poitiers: 

“For all things as the Prophet [Moses] says, were made out of nothing; it was no transformation of existing things, but the creation into a perfect form of the non-existent.” (On the Trinity, Bk IV, 19, Nicene and Post-Niece Fathers, Volume 9, p.76) 

St. Bonaventure: 

“Finally, the perfection and completion of the universe require in all things an order of time and place...the crowning glory of the whole material world, had been made last, that is, on the sixth day for the completion of that world...” (Breviloquium, 155) 

St. Thomas Aquinas: 

“[T]he final perfection, which is the end of the whole universe, is the perfect beatitude of the saints at the consummation of the world; and the first perfection is the completeness of the universe at its first founding, and this is what is ascribed to the seventh day.” (ST I, Q 73, A 1.) 

“The completion of the universe as to the completeness of its parts belongs to the sixth day, but its completion as regards their operation, to the seventh” 

“’Creator.’ To create means to make out of nothing. God alone can create. When a carpenter makes a table, he must have wood; when a tailor makes a coat, he must have cloth. They are only makers and not creators. God needs no material or tools. When we make anything, we make it part by part; but God makes the whole at once. He simply wills and it is made. Thus He said in the beginning of the world: ‘Let there be light; and light was made.’ For example, suppose I wanted a piano. If I could say, ‘Let there be a piano,’ and it immediately sprang up without any other effort on my part, although neither the wood, the iron, the wire, the ivory, nor anything else in it ever existed till I said, ‘Let there be a piano,’ then it could be said I created a piano. No one could do this, for God alone has such power.” 

“This lesson treats of God bringing everything into existence. The chief things created may be classed as follows: (1) The things that simply exist, as rocks, and minerals- gold, silver, iron, etc. (2) Things that exist, grow, and live, like plants and trees. (3) Things that grow, live, feel, and understand, like men. Besides these we have the sun, moon, stars, etc...All these are the works of God’s creation. All these He has called into existence by merely wishing for them.” 

 

[Dogmatic Council of Lateran IV, that 

“God...creator of all visible and invisible things of the spiritual and of the corporeal who by his own omnipotent power at once from the beginning of time created each creature from nothing, spiritual and corporeal namely angelic and mundane and finally the human, constituted as it were, alike of the spirit and the body.” ]

“Q. What is man?
A. Man is a creature composed of a body and soul and made to the image and likeness of God. ‘Creature,’ i.e., a thing created. Man differs from anything else in creation. All things else are either entirely matter, or entirely spirit.” 

“The devil is much wiser than we are, and has much more experience, being among the people of the world ever since the time of Adam- about 6000 years.” 

“What do you believe of Jesus Christ?... 

He was true God equal to His Father from all eternity. He became man when He came upon the earth about 2000 years ago, and was born on Christmas day.” 

“...What happened when Our Lord said, ‘This is My body, this is My blood’?
A. When Our Lord said, “This is My body,” the substance of the bread was changed into the substance of His body. When he said, ‘This is My blood,’ the substance of the wine was changed into the substance of His blood.” 

“Again, it is much easier to change one thing into another than to make it entirely out of nothing. Any one who can create out of nothing can surely change one thing into another. Now Our Lord, being God, created the world out of nothing; and He could therefore easily change the substance of bread into the substance of flesh.” 

In the beginning God created all things; something particular on each of the six days of creation (Genesis i.).” 

“God wished Adam to have a companion; so one day He caused Adam to fall into a deep sleep, and then took from his side a rib, out of which he formed Eve. Now God could have made Eve as He made Adam, by forming her body out of the clay of the earth and breathing into it a soul, but He made Eve out of Adam’s rib to show they were to be husband and wife, and to impress upon their minds the nature and sacredness of love and union that should exist between them.” 

• Many Catholics reject the various claims made in the Baltimore Catechism as against the “science” of today. We must remember that in the first part of the Summa Theologica, in the very first question, St. Thomas Aquinas reminds the Catholic, that the science of Sacred Doctrine (Theology) has the ability to judge the other sciences. Whether those other sciences be philosophy, physics, geology, astronomy, etc. As one can read in the (ST I, Q 1, A 6, ad. 2): 
• 
  “Whatsoever is found in other sciences contrary to any truth of this science must be condemned as false”
  

Page | 42 

From this Catholic catechism, one can now see the defense of a literal six-day creation, with fully formed creatures on each of the six days, about 6,000 years ago. Let us move onto a lighter note with just a short description that defines some of the perfection that Adam and Eve experienced around them (p. 59), 

“Reply to Objection 2: The principles of other sciences either are evident and cannot be proved, or are proved by natural reason through some other science. But the knowledge proper to this science comes through revelation and not through natural reason. Therefore it has no concern to prove the principles of other sciences, but only to judge of them. Whatsoever is found in other sciences contrary to any truth of this science must be condemned as false: ‘Destroying counsels and every height that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God’ (2 Cor. 10:4, 5)

St. John Chrysostom, writes in his Homilies on Genesis 9.4: 

“It is clear that man in the beginning had complete authority over the animals...But that now we are afraid of beasts and do not have authority over them, this I do not deny...In the beginning it was not so, but the beasts...submitted to their master. But when through disobedience he [Adam] lost boldness, then also his authority was diminished...And he [Adam], seeing the beasts near him, did not run away, but like another lord he gives names to the slaves which are subject to him, since he gave names to all animals...This is already sufficient as proof that beasts in the beginning were not frightful for man. But there is another proof not less powerful and even clearer. Which? The conversation of the serpent with the woman. If the beast had been frightful to man, then seeing the serpent the woman would not have stopped, would not have taken his advice, would not have conversed with him with such fearlessness, but immediately on seeing him would have been terrified and run away. But behold, she converses and is not afraid; there was not yet then any fear.” 

Reject those errors against Holy Mother Church’s teaching on origins, and assent, as these Catholic prelates did with their intellect, to the universal Catholic doctrines of all time. God will reward you for your stand against the world and compromised teachers, with the grace not only to fulfill your baptismal vows (as a child of God) but with the graces you need to live out your confirmation vows (as a soldier of Christ!). Crucify that fear of what others will think, as Christ did; Crucify the influence of the false science and false philosophy that has dominated the worldview of mankind now for hundreds of years. You shall surely merit graces that, if accepted, will work for the salvation of souls (your own included). The crown of thorns awaits the Catholic in its modern manifestation: ridicule from almost all - most Catholics, most atheists, most Protestants, and others. By humbly accepting this crown, we will help others to accept their crowns.

Personally opposed to abortion. Who was the source of this disingenuous lie?

The first person to do that publicly was a Catholic Priest, Father Gustave Weigel S.J. (beginning p. 592) "John Courtney Murray, Time/Life and the American Proposition How the CIA/s Doctrinal Warfare Program Changed the Catholic Church" by David A. Wemhoff.

On October 27, 1960 Fr. Weigel gave a talk at the Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament in Washington DC on a "Theological Consideration of the Relations Between Church and State" which according to John W. Finney, who wrote for the New York Time, was an authoritative exposition of the Catholic Hierarchy's views on the 'religious issue' raised by the candidacy of Senator John F. Kennedy.

Weigel said that the "Roman Catholic Church would not attempt to interfere in the political activities of a Catholic President nor would the President be bound by Catholic morality in deciding issues."

According to Weigel, a politician led a"double life" because he "worships as he pleases in his private life, but in his public role "he is a man of law which is framed for practical purposes and canonizes no philosophy or theology."


... " Not only did the American Bishops not contradict Weigel when he contradicted Church teaching, they allowed him to give the talk at the heart of Catholicism in the US - the Shrine of the Most Blessed Sacrament, Washington DC and then allowed the National Catholic Welfare Conference, the secretariat of the Catholic Bishops in the US, to distribute the talk in its entirety.

Americanism über alles.

It was only a few years later (1962-1965 BCE) that the Bestest Council Ever convened and enshrined the principle of Religious Liberty which was the Conciliar triumph of John Courtney Murray.

https://theamericanproposition.com/

https://onepeterfive.com/vatican-ii-american-deep-state/

https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/03/18/how-the-cias-doctrinal-warfare-program-changed-the-catholic-church/

Israel wanted to be like the majority. Did the modern Church want to be like the Protestant majority?

 

	1st Book of Kings (1 Samuel)
	Chapter 8

Samuel growing old, and his sons not walking in his ways, the people desire a king.  1 And it came to pass when Samuel was old, that he appointed his sons to be judges over Israel.  2 Now the name of his firstborn son was Joel: and the name of the second was Abia, judges in Bersabee.  3 And his sons walked not in his ways: but they turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment.  4 Then all the ancients of Israel being assembled, came to Samuel to Ramatha.  5 And they said to him: Behold thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: make us a king, to judge us, as all nations have.  6 And the word was displeasing in the eyes of Samuel, that they should say: Give us a king, to judge us. And Samuel prayed to the Lord.  7 And the Lord said to Samuel: Hearken to the voice of the people in all that they say to thee. For they have not rejected thee, but me, that I should not reign over them.  8 According to all their works, they have done from the day that I brought them out of Egypt until this day: as they have forsaken me, and served strange gods, so do they also unto thee.  9 Now therefore hearken to their voice: but yet testify to them, and foretell them the right of the king, that shall reign over them.  10 Then Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people that had desired a king of him, [7] "Rejected": The government of Israel hitherto had been a theocracy, in which God himself immediately ruled, by laws which he had enacted, and by judges extraordinarily raised up by himself; and therefore he complains that his people rejected him, in desiring a change of government. [9] "The right": That is, the manner (misphat) after which he shall proceed, having no one to control him, when he has the power in his hand.  11 And said: This will be the right of the king, that shall reign over you: He will take your sons, and put them in his chariots, and will make them his horsemen, and his running footmen to run before his chariots,  12 And he will appoint of them to be his tribunes, and centurions, and to plough his fields, and to reap his corn, and to make him arms and chariots.  13 Your daughters also he will take to make him ointments, and to be his cooks, and bakers.  14 And he will take your fields, and your vineyards, and your best oliveyards, and give them to his servants.  15 Moreover he will take the tenth of your corn, and of the revenues of your vineyards, to give his eunuchs and servants.  16 Your servants also and handmaids, and your goodliest young men, and your asses he will take away, and put them to his work.  17 Your flocks also he will tithe, and you shall be his servants.  18 And you shall cry out in that day from the face of the king, whom you have chosen to yourselves. and the Lord will not hear you in that day, because you desired unto yourselves a king.  19 But the people would not hear the voice of Samuel, and they said: Nay: but there shall be a king over us.  20 And we also will be like all nations: and our king shall judge us, and go out before us, and fight our battles for us.  21 And Samuel heard all the words of the people, and rehearsed them in the ears of the Lord.  22 And the Lord said to Samuel: Hearken to their voice, and make them a king. And Samuel said to the men of Israel: Let every man go to his city. Obviously, the parallel I am suggesting does not exist in such a direct and corresponding manner yet it makes me wonder if what the modern Church has done vis a vis ecumenism is not akin to what the people of Israel desired in seeking a government more in keeping of the people surrounding Israel. At Vatican Two it is apparent that the Fathers in attendance there wanted to change the Church so it would be more accommodating to and more akin to the seas of protestant people that surrounded it, especially in Europe. At Vatican Two, and in the wake trailing it, the Church changed the Liturgy, Sacraments, Theology, Religious Orders etc - the Church changed everything so as, one hopes, make it more enticing for protestants to accept it and to convert to it but there was a sudden and profound drop off of every measurable statistic  http://www.seattlecatholic.com/article_20031208.html Well, we do know that a problem can not be corrected unless it is first identified and  we have been told that Vatican Two is a New Pentecost, a new civilisation of love, a great and necessary renewal etc etc C'est la vie.

Luke 9 and Pope Francis

 Catena Aurea

37. And it came to pass, that on the next day, when they were come down from the hill, much people met him.

38. And, behold, a man of the company cried out, saying, Master, I beseech you, look upon my son: for he is my only child.

39. And, lo, a spirit takes him, and he suddenly cries out; and it tears him that he foams again, and bruising him hardly departs from him.

40. And I besought your disciples to cast him out; and they could not.

41. And Jesus answering said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you, and suffer you? Bring your son hither.

42. And as he was yet a coming, the devil threw him down, and tore him. And Jesus rebuked the unclean spirit, and healed the child, and delivered him again to his father.

43a. And they were all amazed at the mighty power of God.

---

BEDE; Certain places accord with certain events. On the Mount our Lord prays, is transfigured, reveals the secrets of His glory to His disciples; as He descends to the lower parts, He is received by a large concourse. As it is said, And it came to pass, that on the next day, when he was come down from the hill, much people met him. Above He makes known the voice of the Father, below He expels the evil spirits. Hence it follows, And, behold, a man of the company cried out, saying, Master, I beseech you look upon my son. TITUS BOST. It seems indeed to me that this was a wise man. For he said not to the Savior, “Do this or that,” but, Look on my son, for this suffices for His salvation; as the prophet said, Look on me, and have mercy on me; and he says, on my son, to show that his was a reasonable forwardness in crying out aloud among the multitude. He adds, for he is my only child. As if to say, There is none other I can expect to be the consolation of my old age. He next enters into the sufferings, that he may move his Hearer to compassion, saying, And, lo, the spirit takes him. He then seems to accuse the disciples, but his answer is rather a justification of his casting aside his fear, saying, And I besought your disciples to cast him out: and they could not. As if he said, Think not that I have come lightly to You. Marvelous is Your greatness! I did not intrude upon Your presence at once, but went first to Your disciples. Because they failed to work the cure, I am now compelled to approach You. Our Lord therefore does not blame him, but the faithless generation; for it follows, And Jesus answering said, Of faithless and perverse generation.

CHRYS. But that this man was much weakened in faith, the writings of the Gospel show us in several places. In that place where he says, Help you my unbelief; and, If you can. And in that where Christ said, All things are possible to him that believes, &c. CHRYS. Hence it seems to me more correct to account the father of the demoniac unbelieving, because he also casts reproach upon the holy Apostles, saying that they could not subdue the evil spirits. But it were better to have sought favor from God by honoring Him, for He has respect to them that fear Him. But he who says that those are weak with respect to their power over evil spirits, who have obtained that power from Christ, calumniates rather the grace than those who are adorned with that grace in whom Christ works. Christ is therefore offended with the accusation of the saints, to whom was entrusted the word of holy preaching. Wherefore the Lord rebukes him and those like-minded with him, saying, O faithless and perverse generation. As if He said, Because of your unbelief the grace has not received its accomplishment.

CHRYS. Now He does not direct His words to him alone but to all the Jews, lest He should cause him to doubt. For it must have been that many were offended THEOPHYL. By the word perverse, He shows that this wickedness in them was not originally or by nature, for by nature indeed they were upright, being the seed of Abraham, but became perverted through malice. CYRIL; As if not knowing how to continue in the right beginnings. Now Christ disdains to dwell with those who are thus disposed. Hence He says, How long shall I be with you, and suffer you? Feeling troubled with their company, because of their evil deeds. CHRYS. Hereby also He shows that His departure was desired by Him, not because the suffering of the cross was grievous, but rather their conversation. BEDE; Not that weariness has overcome His patience, but after the manner of a physician, when he sees a sick man acting contrary to his commands, he says, How long shall I come to your house when I order one thing, you do another. But to prove that He was not angry with the man, but with the sin, He immediately added, Bring your son hither.

Pope Francis, the Vicar of Christ, acts in direct opposition to how Jesus acted. Francis disdains the company of the faithful and calls them Pharisees and loves the company of the Jews and has even invited The World Jewish Congress to set up an office in The Vatican even though he has no intention of seeking their conversion.

The seven heresies Pope Francis will not repudiate

 

Cardinals and Bishop are too cowardly to do their duty and so they let Francis continue to wreck the Faith.

Cardinals and Bishop will not charge Pope Francis with committing formal heresies, giving him a chance to repudiate or correct the heresies, because if he doesn't correct the heresies they can depose him because he is no longer a Catholic because of formal heresy.

As noted in the book, Canon Law holds that the Pope is judged by no one unless he is found to have deviated from the faith - beginning on page 153 "Canon Law and Catholic Theology Concerning The Situation Of A Heretical Pope."

Sedevacantists wrongly argue a Pope automatically loses the Papacy as a result of public heresy with no intervention by the Church being required.

If the Bishops do their duty, the Catholic Church can protect herself from the destruction of Francis but the hour is getting late.

The Church's determining that a pope is a heretic, and the announcement of his heresy by the bishops of the Church, is what makes the pope's heresy a juridicial fact, a fact from which his loss of office ensues. (P. 157)

https://onepeterfive.com/papal-infallibility-after-one-hundred-and-fifty-years/